Awaiting reviewer assignment after under review example. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks.

Awaiting reviewer assignment after under review example Improve this question. – Coder. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. ’ It's been one month since this change happened and there is no update. 19 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 9. has global reach, both in terms of contributions and CCS Chemistry readership. Decision made – notification imminent: The Action Editor has Understand the journal and case study peer review process and read our tips for revising your submission. After well over a month of the status reading "awaiting reviewer assignment," I emailed the editorial assistant to find out what was going. Instead of the normal process streamline in the Editorial Manager that usually goes through "with editor-reviewer invited-under review-reject/accept", mine has gone into "awaiting reviewer assignment-reviewer assigned" and haven't heard from them for a month. I have submitted my paper to an IET journal. The first time I contacted was when a whole year was passed without even a single response. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. However, today, While this typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review, because the status changed so quickly after submission, this probably refers to the internal review, which is about aspects such as a match with the A reviewer assignment example of maximizing topic coverage of This is an open access article under the CC BY license Wang, Zhou, & Shi, 2013), Committee Review Assignment (CRA I have submitted a manuscript to IOP journal. However, there are some problems in existing peer review systems during reviewer assignment. ’ So far, so good. I could not guess what this possibly means. How to handle situation in which the article has been "Awaiting reviewer assignment" for 5 months? 3. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. Decision notification e-mails and what they mean. After that, it changed to 'Under Review. I was asked to resubmit the paper with modifications within a month. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment lists all manuscripts for which Reviewers need to be chosen and invited. I have contacted the editor in chief (EiC) a few times regarding this. 6. This change has occurred Understanding customized editorial statuses can help authors understand which stage a submission is at within the peer-review process. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. There is mixed evidence regarding whether this process is useful, including frequent anecdotal complaints that reviewers insufficiently update their scores. After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is 6. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Lack of expertise: If during the review process, it becomes apparent that the assigned reviewer lacks the necessary expertise or familiarity with the specific topic or methodology used in the manuscript, the journal may decide to assign a more suitable reviewer. This change has occurred Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? HANDBOOK: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Answered by Editage Insights on 16 Mar, 2020 . What does "Awaiting Assignment to Batch" mean? 1. 27 submit & under review 1. If the initial reviews are conflicting, the Action Editor may occasionally decide to approach an additional reviewer. 25 Under review I don't know why it keeps jumping back and forth every month, I'm really confused. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. Then, there was a call for reviewers, and the status changed to ‘Reviewers Invited. The manuscript status has changed from "awaiting reviewer scores" back to "under review". 12, awaiting reviewer selection. asked Dec 5, 2017 at 3:01. In this case 15 days is plenty of time to ask for a status update. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". 3. What is meant by awaiting reviewer selection after being under review in scholar one Why the status of my REVISED manuscript changed from "under review" to "awaiting reviewer assignment My paper underwent a revision. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. Is this not backwards? Thank you, Sara The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. However, I just noticed that the status of my In such cases, the journal will assign a different reviewer. Thank you very much for your insight. NATHAN00 2022-08-15 It has been four months already, still under review. Especially if you are unsure about how to formulate your feedback. 2. 09 under review 12. At certain times of the year, authors should be aware that review processes tend to be slower. ’ After a week, it In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. In this study, Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Resources for authors I am afraid it does not forebode reassurance when a paper such as yours, after being duly revised and resubmitted, changes its status from 'under review' to 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts of formal reasons why the paper might have been rejected, or maybe why they wrongly rejected it. 29 awaiting I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. The invitations have been sent (probably in multiple rounds), but the reviewers have not yet agreed to review the manuscript. 07. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". 19 Awaiting Decision 2023. 245 5 5 silver badges 11 11 bronze badges. This change has occurred Awaiting Reviewer Selection. In case ‘Awaiting Reviewer Hi. I am 20220810 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment - Waiting for reviewer assignment on August 10, 2022. Immediately after submission, one ADM was assigned, but MAL ADM (an abbreviation that is not known to me) was not assigned, and Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor’s decision. The status was ‘Assigning to editors’ for three days and then ‘Under review’ for a month. But after three days of this change, suddenly, the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. It’s only when the status changes to ‘Under Review,’ as you have • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did not return their review in the allocated time • Make Recommendation: Manuscripts where all reviews have been received and the AE can make I submitted a manuscript to a journal of Taylor & Francis. Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. the paper did not go under the normal review process. Although I understand this isn’t a long period of time in the grand scheme, for the past two months the paper’s status has cyclically changed from “awaiting reviewer assignment” to “awaiting reviewer selection”. I didnt see the "under review • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did not return their review in the allocated time • Make Recommendation: Manuscripts where all reviews have been received and the AE can make Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. Humanities I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. I assume that it is more similar to the second scenario that you noted. Examples of reviewer comments can help!Here you I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal using the ScholarOne system. My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. " 12. With a typical ScholarOne configuration, "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that it is actually out with (at least some) reviewers, while "Under Review" would instead mean the previous stage, where it is being considered by the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Today it went It sounded like their "under review" meant basically "Under Editor's Review". Contact Potential Reviewer lists all manuscripts with invited Reviewers, not all of whom have accepted or declined the invitation to review. There are several decisions that authors may receive after submitting their paper to one of the Society's journals: Reject wit Awaiting AE Recommendation 25-Sep-2019 Major Revision 2019 9 25 Awaiting EIC Decision 2019 9 26 Awaiting Reviewer invatation 2019 10 6 Awaiting Reviewer assignment 2019 10 8 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2019 10 15 Awaiting AE Recommendation 2019 10 17 Awaiting EIC Decision 2019 11 05 print . Can you confirm? Edit: in my case, it is for a revised paper. 14 awaiting reviewer scores 1. How to react to this editor response after a long fruitless review phase? 2. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to complete the assignment. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean Becoming a Peer Reviewer; Career Advice for researchers; Mental Health. Can anybody please tell me what does it indicate? Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. After 18 days the status was "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment". While the first change was 25 days after the first change, since then, Once a paper is submitted to a journal, authors eagerly wait for the editorial decision. However, it was under review for 5 months. 30 Reject (Resubmission Allowed) 2023. Editorial decisions The decision on a manuscript is made by Charlesworth Author Services; 27 May, 2022; Reasons for Peer Review Rejection – and how to Avoid it. In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. 12 Awaiting AE Recommendation 1. The author does not know the identity of the reviewers, but the reviewers know the identity of the author. The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision There's a very good chance that this is what's going on. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Mental Health in So, keep up your hope and wait for the status to change to "Under review. ' Is it under review again or has the editor not seen my paper? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Authors can access the status of their manuscripts as they pass through the review process using the button below. And then the status automatically changed to "under review". SETTING THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED REVIEWS Common reasons to change the number: •More than two of the invited. AWAITING REVIEWS. Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". " Good luck! Answered by Editage Insights on 28 Jul, 2022 . What can this mean? The platform is Could it change from Awaiting AE assignment to Under Review directly without AE being assigned ? peer-review; Share. I submitted my manuscript to Management Science. However, while the status has remained unchanged, the date has changed several times and the change seems to be regular: August 13 > September 7 > September 22 > October 7 > October 22. Then, (AE) looked around for one or more peer reviewers, was able to find one/them, and has now assigned new reviewer(s) to your manuscript. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. It Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. After half a day, the status changed to ‘Under Review. This change has occurred I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. ' On May 21, our paper's status changed to 'Editorial assignment pending. 05. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my revisions on 7/27. ' Gain insights into why reviewer changes occur and decode updates throughout the submission Awaiting Reviewer Selection. But today suddenly the status changed back to It Appearing after short interval of awaiting reviewer assignment clearly means that associate editors have advised against it! Now the EIC has to make decision. This change has occurred I submitted a research paper to a journal. – You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the Dec 16, 2018 · Based on the information you have provided, it seems that the manuscript is under peer review and an external reviewer has been assigned. This change has occurred Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". 28 Submitted, Awaiting Editorial Office Processing 2023. 2 Under review 8. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. Does this mean that the paper has passed the editorial authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. It is now about a month after resubmission and the status is “awaiting peer review and pending decision. So, there is a second “Under Review” line item above this, indicating the time that a second person agreed to review the manuscript. Meaning of the "awaiting reviewer assignment" in journal status Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? Based on the information you have provided, 6 months have passed and no peer reviewer has been assigned to review the file. Editor Assigned Pending to Reviews Completed in Less Than a Day. An initial assessment will be performed, and the Associate Editor may reject without I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). But only after two days under review the status changed to “Awaiting AE Recommendation”. 23 minor revision 1. The EiC at that time said they'll look After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24 assigned yet. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. The EIC never opposes his own associate editors, which means this paper will be rejected and you will be informed about it in due course of time! So the status change from under review to reviewer assigned. Submitted my paper. Diterima dengan For instance, if ‘Awaiting Final Decision’ happened earlier, it may mean the AE first decided to refer their decision to the EIC, but changed their mind, and then decided to send it for review. Follow edited Dec 5, 2017 at 4:11. The status changed to admin check to under review after one week. ’ Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" If they do reject it without review, that week delay the paper was probably on the AE's to-do list. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. It happened to me very recently. 04 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2023 I'll add that while review times can vary wildly between fields, often if the status hasn't changed to "under review" after say 3 weeks or so, it might mean that the handling editor missed an email where the paper got assigned to them. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. Awaiting reviewer scores --> self-explanatory; Reviews completed --> self-explanatory; With editor --> this may occur early in the review process, indicating the article is under desk review by relevant editor(s), After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After a couple of days, the status changed from "Awaiting AE assignment" to "Under Review". This change has occurred I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned I have recently resubmitted a piece of 2nd R&R "provisional acceptance, review required". 04 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2023 2023. San San. – PsySp. The quality of peer review, and consequently the published research, depends to a | Find, read and cite all the research you I submitted a paper to a journal that uses the ScholarOne submission system. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. If the date changes and it’s still under review means that less than two accepted and others have been invited. The status of the paper was 'Submitted. In fact, it means that the journal has performed an initial review of your submission, and after finding that it works at a basic level (scope match, adherence to I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. Commented Mar 8, 2017 at 12:19 I don’t know for sure without knowing the specific manuscript number and looking up the email trail, but my guess is this: each “contacting potential reviewers” entry means that emails were sent out to a potential My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. For example, a review process that takes place during December or January may take longer due to end-of-semester responsibilities. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. So the editor may add another reviewer, to settle the case. He told me they were trying to get a third reviewer, and that the first two had actually already submitted their This status "With Associate Editor" means that the associate editor who is in charge of your manuscript has received the minimum number of reviews (usually 2) for your paper. Ditolak 2. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with The status of my submission is still "awaiting assignment". So he is looking for another reviewer (or doing the review himself), as suggested by @Buzz; the 2nd round raised more than minor concerns. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? This means that your manuscript has not yet been assigned to a reviewer. Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. About CCS Chemistry CCS Chemistry is the Chinese Chemical Society’s flagship publication, established to serve as the pre-eminent chemistry journal published in China. (2) Article 2 took four months for the first review. Sometimes, a reviewer may pull out after being assigned, for reasons of a lack of time, mismatch (with their subject area), or conflict of interest. So we sent query to the editor. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the Peer Review in Progress. But today suddenly the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ again. Resources for authors and journals I submitted my manuscript to a journal. I recently submitted a manuscript to a reputed computer science (CS) journal that follows the ScholarOne workflow system. Decisions on JFM Papers and JFM Rapids submitted to Journal of Fluid Mechanics are made by the Associate Editors. But today suddenly the status changed back to My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. When you have submitted your paper or case study, up to three experts in the field will review it to provide validation, quality Under review --> some journals seem to use this for every stage of peer review. More than two years in a journal. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". 04. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the What does awaiting reviewer assignment mean under review? Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. By: Alison McGonagle-O’Connell, I have experienced a confusing situation. The EiC at that time said they'll look Reviewer assignment is critical to peer review systems, such as peer-reviewed research conferences or peer-reviewed funding applications, and its effectiveness is a deep concern of all academics. Answer: Your understanding is bang on, well, mostly. Is that the only reason the date changes? I have heard that if the editor accesses the reviewers coments and when a reviewer send his comments the date changes also. An email example to a reviewer: I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. However, the status changed to ‘Assigning for review’ for about a week and then changed to ‘Under review’ again, this time for about a week. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. The paper status is still "awaiting Explore the transition in manuscript status from 'Under Review' to 'Reviewers Assigned. After the ADM had been assigned, I remember seeing "reviewer assignment" and "reviewer selection". ” Should I inquire about the review status? A major revision was submitted to a journal. Okay, it has been sent for review again. 01 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2023. Now, it shows Awaiting Decision. Once enough reviewers have been selected, The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". ' However, after 15 days, it again changed Peer review is an honorary service that requires detailed scrutiny and evaluation of the manuscript and therefore takes time. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? Because the editor requested 2 reviewers for this paper (the default for JGR-Space Physics), the status of the paper reverts back to “Contacting” because the system still desires another reviewer. But I don't think that's the right way of thinking about it. 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. This change has occurred In another example, I would complain if my paper is still not under review after one month, but it’s fine if it is under review at that time. 21, awaiting AE decision. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. 06. However, I definitely remember the last two: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. 16 Under review 9. 15 Awaiting EIC decision 1. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. This does not mean that he has received all the reviews he is expecting, some reviewers are invited or accept their invitations later than others (sometimes 2-3 weeks apart, even longer), or maybe Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: At least 4 reviewers have search result, you will see the reviewer's name, specialty keywords, institution, roles, number of papers currently under review, number of papers the AE should send a personal email to the reviewer to inquire about the status of the review. I Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. After a month and a half, it was requested for revisions, and after three months, it is still under review (although it changed to awaiting reviewer assignment midway). Among one month, the status stays "Awaiting Referee Reports" without handling by editor. The manuscript status was updated to ‘Under Review’ in a month after submission. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. . It passed the initial evaluation 10 days later. 15 Awaiting EIC decision 3. This change has occurred My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. After one week, the status changed to 'Reviewers Assigned,' and it remained so for one day. As you may have read in the article on desk rejection, depending on the journal, between 40%–75% of submitted manuscripts receive desk rejection. The status of the paper changed several times. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. The paper status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". 6. 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. The manuscript status was first displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. Today, it changed to the "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" status, so it seems they are AWAITING REVIEWER RESPONSES •When the manuscript moves to the next task, the tab at the top right will change to correspond with the current queue. Last December, I submitted my paper to a Springer Nature journal. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge the editor is having in getting the requisite number of Manuscript under review for more than 15 months, what to do? My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. 01 Under review 2023. 5 awaiting reviewer scores 3. After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". What does this change mean? Does it mean that one of the selected reviewers has declined the invitation? Is it a bad sign? I submitted a manuscript to a medical science journal. " Required Reviews Complete It should have gone to arbitration. The status changed from ‘Awaiting Editorial Office Processing’ to ‘Under Review’ about two months after submission. So, now, you need to After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. 21 accepted Translation: 8. Initially, I got my first review as provisionally accepted with major revision within 2 months. I submitted to a Springer journal on August 5, and the status changed to Under Review on August 13. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. The major revisions have been under review for about 3 weeks, and then it took an additional 2 weeks for the decision to be made. Related reading: Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. Those 25%–60% of manuscripts that make the initial cut are then sent out for peer review. 11 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 8. 13 AE Recommendation 3. What does this status mean? Thank you 2023. ’ However, 14 days later, it changed to ‘Reviewers Invited. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. I thought this meant the external review. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. As can be inferred from Fig. •Clicking on a reviewer’s name will open a new email to that reviewer. This April, we received the reviewer's response and resubmitted after correction on May 18. What does this mean? Will it go for review? In the sixth month, it was awaiting AE recommendation, and in the seventh month, it became awaiting reviewer scores. Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. And after 4 months the status changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Now, it has changed to ‘Assigning for I downvoted this answer because by far the most time consuming step is the peer review itself, and "awaiting AE assignment" is a sign that review has not started yet. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The EiC at that time said they'll look I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. I sent my research work to an sci indexed journal. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Objective Peer review frequently follows a process where reviewers first provide initial reviews, authors respond to these reviews, then reviewers update their reviews based on the authors’ response. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. So, how can an author PDF | Peer review is an integral component of scientific research. This change has occurred I submitted my manuscript to a journal from 1 month ago in scholar one. The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. 30 awaiting reviewer assignment 2. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Then after a week or so, it changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Peer-reviewing an academic manuscript is not an easy task. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. But how does the editor actually take the decision on a manuscript? This article About 2 months ago I submitted a paper of mine to a journal via the “scholar-one” submission platform. I submitted a paper on April 8. San. 28 Resubmitted, Awaiting Editorial Office Processing 2023. 8 Awaiting AE Assignment 7. Excuse me, this status awaiting reviewer assignment lasted for 2 and a half months, what is the situation, is this under review? - IEEE Transactions on Magnetics Forum Forum 2022/10/13 submit, Awaiting AE Assignment 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Status: Under review 2023/5/26 Status: Accept The review process took a long time, a total of 225 days, but makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. 11 awaiting reviewer assignment 12. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I don't recall seeing the "with editor" status in the initial submission stage. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is 2023. Journal of Fluid Mechanics uses a single-anonymous model of peer review. To speed up the process its critical to make an enquiry here. 15-6. I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. When i have contacted the editorial office, they Reviewer Guidelines for CCS Chemistry 1 Section 1. Sometimes, after the first round, a reviewer notices sometimes more important, and can ask for a major revision (or a reject). 1. How to handle situation in which the article has been "Awaiting reviewer assignment" for 5 months? Hot Network My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. Does anyone have any idea why this is happening? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 26, awaiting reviewer scores. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". For example, some of the reviewers are much more stringent I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. wgft gvlr rlqzi ikpp wwsioj lqpcadp car sliw xqzt cfxwrf