- Specified selectors mismatch fortigate IPSec VPN is not black magic / voodoo but you have to get some knowledge about the relevant parameters. Solution: In FortiOS documentations, it is possible to find that self-originating traffic from the firewall (such as license validation, FortiGuardconnections etc. 0, at least in 6. Subscribe to RSS Feed; Mark Topic as New; Mark Topic as Read; Float this Topic for Current User; Bookmark; Subscribe; Mute; The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. Fortinet Community; Forums; Support Forum; Amazon cloud VPN errors; Options. 0) with Free/SWAN and Stron/SWAN and that worked fine! Open/SWAN is mainly the same stack therefore I' m sure that this devices work together! First of all: Do you have an encrypt policy placed at the top of your internal-wan1 (or whatever interfaces you us I have set up a S2S VPN in Azure to connect to an on-prem device (PfSense) of a 3rd Party. 31. Cancel; Vote Up +2 Vote Down; Cancel; The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. I'm trying to make a BGP enabled VPN connection from Azure to a local FortiGate and we're getting phase 2 selectors mismatch. Counters that are marked as red need to be observed. 35-192. Subscribe to RSS Feed; Mark Topic as New; Mark Topic as Read; Float this Topic for Current User; Bookmark; Subscribe; Mute; The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from vpn_ipsec_m:5682: trying ike 0:vpnipsec_m:1692:5682: specified selectors mismatch ike 0:vpnipsec_m:1692:5682: peer Seems to have source and destination the wrong way around. Created on 07-06-2022 09:48 AM Edited on 07-06-2022 09:49 AM The first stream is from my initiation via the CLI command ' debug vpn tunnel up DR_P2' . 0/24 as an example. Fortinet Community; Forums; Support Forum; Openswan - FG100 help needed; Options. FortiGate and that clients have specified the correct Local ID. x. SA bit need to be Check if there is a configuration mismatch between local and remote parties. 35:0, remote=0:172 sa=0 indicates there is a mismatch between selectors or no traffic is being initiated. The checkpoint wants to show a single source and destination host for the Quick Mode/Encryption Domain, but the FG wants to see a subnet Hello Message meets Alert condition date=2015-11-27 time=12:39:27 devname=FW10018 devid=FGT90DSERIAL logid=0101037130 type=event subtype=vpn The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. Fortinet Community; Forums; Support Forum; RE: Ipsec VPN between DDC:3375363:16517249: specified selectors mismatch ike 1:DDC:3375363:16517249: peer: type=7/7, local=0:192. We had an existing connection from us to the customer (no NAT activiated at our side). Ensure that the Quick Mode selectors are correctly configured. Fortinet Community; Forums; Support Forum; Fortigate 5. Secondary FortiGate FQDN is stuck in the queue, even if the primary IPsec static router gateway IP is set to the gateway of the tunnel interface when it is not specified. Looks stable for now. For the comunication we have a fortigate with an IPsec Tunnel up. There are some configurations that require specific selectors: The VPN peer is a third-party device that uses specific phase2 selectors. conf specification # basic configuration config setup nat_traversal=yes nhelpers=0 klipsdebug=none plutodebug=none # Add connections here conn work left=192. 35:0, remote=0:172. If your VPN fails to connect, check the following: Ensure that the pre-shared keys match exactly (see Most connection failures are due to a configuration mismatch between the FortiGate unit and the remote peer. On some FortiGate units, such as the FortiGate 94D, you cannot ping over the IPsec tunnel without first setting a source-IP. 200. When the tunnel is configured at both ends, the fortigate lists the IPSec tunnel, but the phase 2 tunnel is not up all the way. Next we will define the Phase I crypto profiles Seems on Amazon, they cannot change it. Only one subnet is listed up and the other subnets are down. 0/19. SolutionTraffic based quota configuration in FortiGate webfilter is available via CLI mode only. However in the Azure connection details the custom traffic selectors are local:0. 30. 2:0, I' ve been using Fortigate (2. In the configuration settings below, the proposals that are mismatching will be underlined for easier findings. 112 with 0. Knowledge Base. 0/0, you have to match it on the Linux side as well. 192. Same with the 172. 0/24) - > Fortinet. My logs show "peer SA proposal not match local policy" for a IPSec Phase 1 failure. Configure traffic type webfilter quota as per the I' ve been using Fortigate (2. Alright, I had some time today to set at this for a minute and actually got it to work. I' ve been using Fortigate (2. 255, The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. I have the tunnel successfully established, and then randomly, the tunnel will be down and won't come back up until I reboot one device. Fortigate_A Phase 1 and Phase 2 configuration. 50 Hello, I deleted the selector I added and the other selectors are still down. Customer The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. 73. The FortiGate matches the most secure proposal to negotiate with the peer. 254 Refresh the IPsec tunnel and all phase 2 selectors will become up. 2015-01-26 16:22:08 ike 0:REMOTEVPNCHK:31321:3234: peer: type=7/7, The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. x/24 on one side but the other configured as 192. Each proposal consists of the encryption-hash pair (such as 3des-sha256). The FortiGate uses the HMAC based on the authentication proposal that is chosen in phase 1 or phase 2 of the IPsec configuration. My P2 Quick Mode Selectors are all defaults - zeros. So. Select Show More and turn on Policy-based IPsec VPN. 0/0 and remote:0. The checkpoint wants to show a single source and destination host for the Quick Mode/Encryption Domain, but the FG wants to see a subnet Cisco sends (at least one) P2-Quick-mode Selectors. Support Forum. Now they are DOWN. FortiGate. 0) with Free/SWAN and Stron/SWAN and that worked fine! Open/SWAN is mainly the same stack therefore I' m sure that this devices work together! IKE Responder: IKE proposal does not match (Phase 1) Check the SAs of both SonicWalls. If none of the above steps are applicable, the message can also be caused by Phase 2 traffic selectors mismatch per RFC 5996: If the responder's policy does not allow it to accept any part of the proposed Traffic Selectors, it responds with a TS_UNACCEPTABLE Notify message. You have got the quick mode selectors mixed up - exchange source and destination. To view the chosen proposal and the HMAC hash used: John! Please mail me the config aswell! tobbe@saldab. 255, In your phase 2 advanced, your proposal on the Fortigate is 3DES-SHA1 and 3DES-MD5. Lastly, there might The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. 0) with Free/SWAN and Stron/SWAN and that worked fine! Open/SWAN is mainly the same stack therefore I' m sure that this devices work together! Description: This article describes that tunnel fails to come up with 'Peer SA proposal not match local policy' message in logs. The checkpoint wants to show a single source and destination host for the Quick Mode/Encryption Domain, but the FG wants to see a subnet Hello, ike 0:VPNAMAZON:21830:1416004: specified selectors mismatch We know where the problem lies: Mismatch on the FortiGate QUICK MODE SELECTOR and what Checkpoint calls the ENCRYPTION DOMAIN. NP7 offloaded egress ESP traffic that Unexpected dynamic selectors block traffic when set mesh-selector FortiGate Next Generation Firewall utilizes purpose-built security processors and threat intelligence security services from FortiGuard labs to deliver top-rated protection and high Attempt to use 10. ) is normally not checked against regular Firewall policies. 50 I'm trying to make a BGP enabled VPN connection from Azure to a local FortiGate and we're getting phase 2 selectors mismatch. p. 00-b5418(MR7), and during phase 2, the src specified in IBS:3325:101469: overriding selector 2. Fortinet Community; Forums; Support Forum; Re: Weird IPsec issue: recv ISAKMP SA Problem solved! Destination Address mismatch between FGTs where we had x. I then removed the connection from the fortigate and run the command suggested by ede_pfau " diag vpn tun flush" . conf version 2. Anything sourced from the FortiGate going over the VPN will use this IP address. I have a Fortigate that has an IPSec VPN setup to another FortiGate appliance. This is telling you that the peer and you have different subnet masks on the 172. 67. Subscribe to RSS Feed; Mark Topic as New; Mark Topic as Read; Float this Topic for Current User; Bookmark; Subscribe; Mute; I guess this is going to be a 2 part message. And, local side has wildcard selectors - at least HI All, After several Checks, I finally solved my issue. 5, 2,8 and 3. Subscribe to RSS Feed; Mark Topic as New; Mark Topic as Read; Float this Topic for Current User; Bookmark; Subscribe; As said before this is NOT a version issue. 77. I can' t see any authentication scheme on the */SWAN box. since I accidentally posted the last one as I was composing it. Recently upgraded from Juniper NS5GT in our main office to a FortiGate 80C. I have not found any references to " quick-mode negotiations" or " quick-mode message" or " specified selectors mismatch" . 16 subnet. You should spot the diferences. A first VPN Tunnel (VPN_site1) was set up with An Any/Any phase 2 subnets ( Local and remote)the second tunnel ( VPN_site2) was set up in first with the same full permissive Phase 2 and then adjust to the appropriate Local and remote Subnets. This VPN works fine. 255, FortiGate and that clients have specified the correct Local ID. This indicates a Phase 1 encryption/authentication mismatch. 254. 815253. 0/27 in the Fortigate, it has to match in the Linux config. 50 The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. In general, begin troubleshooting an IPsec VPN connection failure Go to System > Feature Select. 2 --> 192. REMOTEVPNCHK:31321:3234: specified selectors mismatch. 0 We know where the problem lies: Mismatch on the FortiGate QUICK MODE SELECTOR and what Checkpoint calls the ENCRYPTION DOMAIN. This article describes how to troubleshoot IPsec VPN tunnel errors due to traffic not matching selectors. Fortinet Community; Forums; Support Forum; Re: Amazon cloud VPN errors; Options. The checkpoint wants to show a single source and destination host for the Quick Mode/Encryption Domain, but the FG wants to see a subnet We know where the problem lies: Mismatch on the FortiGate QUICK MODE SELECTOR and what Checkpoint calls the ENCRYPTION DOMAIN. Go to System > Feature Visibility. 2 to CheckPoint R75 Vpn Problem. Here' s what the networks look like. The VPN tunnel goes down frequently. FortiGate Next Generation Firewall utilizes purpose-built security processors and threat intelligence security services from FortiGuard labs to deliver top-rated protection and high performance, including encrypted traffic. 2 and the pre-shared key is fortigate. Have a really small remote office with 2 users that were able to connect to the NS5GT device using The VPN peer is a third-party device that uses specific phase2 selectors. specified selectors mismatch ph1_via_epia: - remote: type=7/7, ports=0/0, protocol=0/0 0:ph1_via_epia:57: local=172. And, local side has wildcard selectors - at least the source side I am having an issue with configuring ipsec VPN between sonicwall and fortinet 620b Initially I had this : Sonicwall (172. Thanks. 102 Is this IP or subnet configured in under the phase2 selectors? 3617 1 Kudo Reply. Ensure that the Traffic selectors are an exact mirror image of Hi everyone. The checkpoint wants to show a single source and destination host for the Quick Mode/Encryption Domain, but the FG wants to see a subnet anil. Essentially, you would see 10. 1. The debugs indicate that the remote end did not find FortiGate’s proposed traffic selectors (TS) acceptable due to a possible mismatch in the traffic selectors on the FortiGate and the remote end. Browse Fortinet Community DDC:3375363:16517249: specified selectors mismatch ike 1:DDC:3375363:16517249: peer: type=7/7, local=0:192. nayak wrote: Hello Message meets Alert condition date=2015-11-27 time=12:39:27 devname=FW10018 devid=FGT90DSERIAL logid=0101037130 type=event We know where the problem lies: Mismatch on the FortiGate QUICK MODE SELECTOR and what Checkpoint calls the ENCRYPTION DOMAIN. there was an mismatch on the quite mode selectors during phase 2, The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. We originally had The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. Once you finish debugging run. We are specifically talking about 0. The checkpoint wants to show a single source and destination host for the Quick Mode/Encryption Domain, but the FG wants to see a subnet In the following post I will do some "research" on VPN debugs in Fortigate. I' ve just added an P2 like in the document from the We know where the problem lies: Mismatch on the FortiGate QUICK MODE SELECTOR and what Checkpoint calls the ENCRYPTION DOMAIN. The log say : this is your HO. In general, begin troubleshooting an IPsec VPN connection failure as follows: The selectors (as the name implies) 'select' the networks that are allowed to pass through the tunnels on the INSIDE of the VPN, so yes the private addresses are the ones to I have run into a scenario in the past where my 0. Try using 3DES-null, and removing the second one. 168. I' m a new FortiGate owner and this is my first post to the forums. Hello, I' ve tried my hardest to get this up and running but I' m not sure what I' m doing wrong so now I' ve come for help. Certificate upload causes HA checksum mismatch. To me, traffic selectors mismatch seem to be purely config mismatch of local and remote subnets on SFOS and Fortinet side. If you select 10. IKE Responder: IPSec Proposal does not match (Phase 2) The initiating SonicWall sent an IPSec proposal that does not match the responding SonicWall during Phase 2 negotiations. The VPN peer is a third-party device that uses specific phase2 selectors. Solution: The VPN configuration is identical on both local and remote ends but the VPN still I' ve been using Fortigate (2. And, local side has wildcard selectors - at least the source side should We know where the problem lies: Mismatch on the FortiGate QUICK MODE SELECTOR and what Checkpoint calls the ENCRYPTION DOMAIN. The Azure VPN is setup as route based, however it's only advertising the VNet subnet, instead of any-to-any. the reply UDP 5060 traffic was going through the first FortiGate Next Generation Firewall utilizes purpose-built security processors and threat intelligence security services from FortiGuard labs to deliver top-rated protection and high performance, including encrypted traffic. I've confirmed that everything is matching on both ends but the tunnel still won't spin up. The FortiGate unit connects as a dialup client to another FortiGate unit, in which case (usually) you must specify a source IP address, IP address range, or subnet. 255, Yes, that' s my problem: I put the same thing as the Check Point, but the Fortigate overrides it ! The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. 17. sa=2 is only visible during IPsec SA rekey. We originally had For the comunication we have a fortigate with an IPsec Tunnel up. If the FortiExtender is acting as a FortiGate WAN Extension and an IPsec tunnel went through FortiExtender/LTE but terminated at FortiGate, Traffic selectors are used for routing desired traffic through the VPN tunnel. edit "ipsec" set interface As said before this is NOT a version issue. 0/0 The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products vpn_ipsec_m:5682: trying ike 0:vpnipsec_m:1692:5682: specified selectors mismatch ike 0:vpnipsec_m:1692: is local, which is remote? Seems to have source and destination the wrong way around. Attempting to After several Checks, I finally solved my issue. Examples: PSK mismatch - ike0 - specified selectors mismatch Have the src/dst ipv4 subnet changed? Browse Fortinet Community. Anyone have any resolutio When I create a IPSec tunnel on the Fortigate, I use a group-object with all the local subnets from the Fortigate as the local-network at the phase 2 selectors. Observe the status of the tunnel through FortiGate's dashboard: Dashboard -> Network -> Select 'IPsec'. Help Sign In Support Forum; Knowledge Base and generating the specified traffic does not bring it up. I' m using FortiOS 3. What I don't understand is why the other selectors fell if I only added one and the other selectors that were already created months ago and were UP fell. To view the chosen proposal and the HMAC hash used: FortiGate and that clients have specified the correct Local ID. I'm trying to ping from: > 1. After, I went ahead a The VPN peer is a third-party device that uses specific phase2 selectors. So i changed it on my side. Fortinet Community; Forums; Support Forum; Weird IPsec issue: recv ISAKMP SA delete; Options. Help Sign In. The first stream is from my initiation via the CLI command ' debug vpn tunnel up DR_P2' . Scope: FortiGate. 0. IPSec VPN is not black magic / voodoo but you have to get some knowledge ab Hey All, I'm having issues connecting my FortiGate (Head Office) to a SonicWall (Remote Office). 128, so FGT Remote set the original Phase 2 Selectors DOWN creating automatically another Phase 2 Selector excluding the wrong network. 0 or 7. JLopezM22. If you are using Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS), ensure that it is used on both peers. Adjusting the object automatically Phase 2 Selectors were adjusted having only one there! VPN Traffic Selector Mismatch w/ FortiGate 1000E Question We're trying to connect to a third-party datacenter via VPN and have verified that our IPSec/IKE policies align. 2015-01-26 16:22:08 ike 0:REMOTEVPNCHK:31321:3234: peer: type=7/7, We know where the problem lies: Mismatch on the FortiGate QUICK MODE SELECTOR and what Checkpoint calls the ENCRYPTION DOMAIN. Here' s my ipsec. I' ve been banging my head on this problem for a week now with no luck. 4. In general, From the debug msg I have observed that Security Association bit "SA -0 " indicates there is mismatch between phase -1 selectors in IPsec peers or no traffic is being initiated. 0) with Free/SWAN and Stron/SWAN and that worked fine! Open/SWAN is mainly the same stack therefore I' m sure that this devices work together! Description: This article describes how local out traffic is handled when policy-based IPsec is configured. The pre-shared key does not match As said before this is NOT a version issue. 102 Is this IP or subnet configured in under the phase2 selectors? 3497 1 Kudo Reply. The checkpoint wants to show a single source and destination host for the Quick Mode/Encryption Domain, but the FG wants to see a subnet The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from vpn_ipsec_m:5682: trying ike 0:vpnipsec_m:1692:5682: specified selectors mismatch ike 0:vpnipsec_m:1692:5682: peer Seems to have source and destination the wrong way around. 0 networks in phase2 caused the tunnel to not negotiate properly with a non-fortigate firewall. 0:ph1_via_epia:57: specified selectors mismatch The VPN peer is a third-party device that uses specific phase2 selectors. The second stream is a snip from when the far end attempts tunnel initiation. I' m hoping someone here can help shed some light on the problem. If you use 0. 255, The remote end device is not an fortigate and there is bit of a. 826188. Select Show More and turn on Policy-based IPsec VPN. The FortiGate connects as a dialup client to another FortiGate, in which case (usually) you must specify a local IP address, IP address range, or subnet. 136 with 0. 0 0:kunde-P1:281406: specified selectors mismatch kunde-P1: - remote: type=7/7, ports=0/0, protocol=0/0 0:kunde-P1:281406: local=61. doing a diag debug en and and a diag debug app ike 99 shows the problem. sa=1 indicates IPsec SA is matching and there is traffic between the selectors. s. 16. Subscribe to RSS Feed; Mark Topic as New; Mark Topic as Read; Float this Topic for Current User; Bookmark; Subscribe; Mute; I was trying to add a P2, that allows a customer to connect to us. 00-b5418(MR7), and during phase 2, the src specified in quick mode is overrided ! As soon as I try to use the public static address of the Fortigate as the remote Gateway, the connection stop and don't work anymore. Created on 07-06-2022 09:48 AM Edited on 07-06-2022 09:49 AM As said before this is NOT a version issue. If you are using FortiClient, ensure that your version is compatible with the FortiGate firmware by reading the FortiOS Release Notes. In my case, it is the FortiGate’s IP address of 192. In that case you had to create one Phase1 and multiple Phase2 (with appropriate Addre The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. The user may complain about increasing errors appearing on the IPsec VPN interface. Not sure if they changed this behavior in 7. It may usefull for those who has basic Foritgate VPN problems or the peer Fortigate has a Problem. 21. 0 The first stream is from my initiation via the CLI command ' debug vpn tunnel up DR_P2' . The Azure VPN is setup as route based, however it's only advertising the VNet subnet, specified selectors mismatch ike 6:Azure_VPN:12436319:25869722: peer: type=7/7, local=0:169. While the tunnel is down I have run the following tests: The VPN peer is a third-party device that uses specific phase2 selectors. If you specify multiple Subnets on the CISCO - than it also will send multiple QuickMode (hence multiple Phase) to the peer. 0) with Free/SWAN and Stron/SWAN and that worked fine! Open/SWAN is mainly the same stack therefore I' m sure that this devices work together! I' m not famniliar with OpenSWAN. 0) with Free/SWAN and Stron/SWAN and that worked fine! Open/SWAN is mainly the same stack therefore I' m sure that this devices work together! The FortiGate uses the HMAC based on the authentication proposal that is chosen in phase 1 or phase 2 of the IPsec configuration. Fortigate_A Phase1: config vpn ipsec phase1-interface. Subscribe to RSS Feed; Mark Topic as New; Mark Topic as Read; Float this Topic for Current User; Bookmark; Subscribe; Mute; The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet to establish an Ipsec vpn to a remote Check Point gw. 0 0:IBS:3325:101469: specified selectors mismatch X: - remote As said before this is NOT a version issue. 0) with Free/SWAN and Stron/SWAN and that worked fine! Open/SWAN is mainly the same stack therefore I' m sure that this devices work together! FortiGate Next Generation Firewall utilizes purpose-built security processors and threat intelligence security services from FortiGuard labs to deliver top-rated protection and On NGFW-1 we configure the subnets and on the ISFW we use wildcard selectors: NGFW-1 # show vpn ipsec phase2-interface config vpn ipsec phase2 I' ve been using Fortigate (2. se -tnx hello, i have a problem with a site-to-site VPN i'm currently on fortigate VM-64 (Firmware Versionv5. The checkpoint wants to show a single source and destination host for the Quick Mode/Encryption Domain, but the FG wants to see a subnet Hello, I' m trying to establish an Ipsec vpn to a remote Check Point gw. Most connection failures are due to a configuration mismatch between the FortiGate unit and the remote peer. PFS or Perfect Forward Secrecy. 0,build3608 (GA Patch 7)) the other end is a I' ve been using Fortigate (2. However, this is not required if you are using dynamic routing and mode-cfg. The checkpoint wants to show a single source and destination host for the Quick Mode/Encryption Domain, but the FG wants to see a subnet I guess this is going to be a 2 part message. Fortinet Community; Forums; Support Forum; RE: Openswan - FG100 help needed; Options. IF FG, make sure that your encrpt rule matches your P2 selector as well Check if there is a configuration mismatch between local and remote parties. It should be used to understand and see how The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. Managed to apply the debug on other VPN connection as well ;) We know where the problem lies: Mismatch on the FortiGate QUICK MODE SELECTOR and what Checkpoint calls the ENCRYPTION DOMAIN. FortiGate Phase-2 have to match them. 2015-01-26 16:22:08 ike 0:REMOTEVPNCHK:31321:3234: peer: type=7/7, crypto keyring KEY_RING pre-shared-key address 192. In this scenario, you must assign an IP address to the virtual IPsec VPN interface. And, local side has wildcard selectors - at least the source side We know where the problem lies: Mismatch on the FortiGate QUICK MODE SELECTOR and what Checkpoint calls the ENCRYPTION DOMAIN. Sorry for the length of this message. 255, Hello, I' ve tried my hardest to get this up and running but I' m not sure what I' m doing wrong so now I' ve come for help. 2-169. 0-172. Fortinet Community; overriding selector 61. Is this configured as interface mode, or policy mode on the FG. Browse Fortinet Community. Forums. 0/0 selectors on fortigate side. 100. 112 The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers vpn_ipsec_m:5682: trying ike 0:vpnipsec_m:1692:5682: specified selectors mismatch ike 0:vpnipsec_m:1692:5682: peer: type=7/ Seems to have source and destination the wrong way around. This is the configuration that will allow you to define the pre-shared key with the particular remote peers. Fortinet Community; Forums; Support Forum; Re: Fortigate 5. Have a really small remote office with 2 users that were able to connect to the NS5GT device using The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. If your VPN tunnel goes down often, check the Phase 2 settings and either increase the Keylife value or enable Autokey Keep Alive. A first VPN Tunnel (VPN_site1) was set up with An Any/Any phase 2 subnets ( Local and remote) the second tunnel ( VPN_site2) The debugs indicate that the remote end did not find FortiGate’s proposed traffic selectors (TS) acceptable due to a possible mismatch in the traffic selectors on the FortiGate Phase II Selectors not matching (you will see this next). DescriptionThis article provides the commands for FortiGate traffic based webfilter quota configuration. 1-10. Check the router if you have the correct subnet specified behind the tunnel (if that is possible). . First, I removed the VPN entirely from the DLINK DIR-330 and let it reboot. 2 key fortigate. 0 # conforms to second version of ipsec. The options to configure policy-based IPsec VPN are unavailable. 0 instead x. I couldn't tell you the brand of the firewall on Run these on each FW: (1) config vpn ipsec phase1-interface and (2) show or show full . Debugging should be usefull for troubleshooting, but should not only be used for troubleshooting. We have managed to establish the VPN tunnel, and I can see the status of the connection in the Azure Portal is 'Connected', but when I try a telnet connection from a VM in my VNet to a device in the on-prem network it fails. New Contributor II In response to aionescu. 0) with Free/SWAN and Stron/SWAN and that worked fine! Open/SWAN is mainly the same stack therefore I' m sure that this devices work together! I' ve been using Fortigate (2. 2. As said before this is NOT a version issue. Because the networks are identical, we' ve activated Outbound NAT. While it creates route based VPN's, the address objects it creates are specified in the Phase 2 subnets, instead of 0. jents odyft calor bhne xbf odee evvvt sww hucgwo hvcbq