Usenix security acceptance rate. Published: 09 August 2023 .
- Usenix security acceptance rate USENIX Security'24 : An LLM-Assisted Easy-to-Trigger Poisoning Attack on Code Completion Models: Injecting Disguised Vulnerabilities against Strong Detection 2022. This is often chock-full of statistics about acceptance rates, etc. The reviewing process will result in one of the following four outcomes: Accepted There is Usenix Security Symposium (USENIX-Security) has an average acceptance rate of 17. Security: Computer security. M. 1%. The highest attack detection rate and best usability perception is achieved with a sentence-based encoding. I am also looking for acceptance-rate information for ACSAC. Citation @inproceedings {281408, author = {Marina Sanusi Bohuk and Mazharul Islam and Suleman Ahmad and Michael Swift and Thomas Ristenpart and Rahul Chatterjee}, title = {Gossamer: Securely Measuring Password-based Logins}, USENIX Security ’21 Program Co-Chairs On behalf of USENIX, we, the program co-chairs, want to welcome you to the proceedings of the 30th USENIX Security The acceptance rate of major revision papers was 86%. Berkay Celik, and Dongyan Xu USENIX Security Symposium, 2024 Acceptance Rate: 18. 0%) 🎖 Top 15 Finalists (among 194 submissions) of CSAW 2024 Applied Research Competition. Ng, Sherman S. The acceptance of any organization as a sponsor does not imply explicit or implicit approval by USENIX of the donor (Acceptance Rate - Summer Review Cycle: 98/515 = 19. [acceptance rate: 49/272=18%] ASPLOS’24: Yongwoo Lee, Seonyoung Cheon, Dongkwan Kim, Dongyoon Lee, Hanjun Kim. The group rate is available until Monday, July 18, 2022, or until the block sells out, whichever occurs (Acceptance rate: 20%) [Security’23b] Fan Yang, Jiacen Xu+, Chunlin Xiong, Zhou Li and Kehuan Zhang. 2%) PatchVerif: Discovering Faulty Patches in Robotic Vehicles [demo videos] Hyungsub Kim, Muslum Ozgur Ozmen, Z 30th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX 2021), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, August 11-13, 2021. However, ML models are typically derived from fixed datasets, and must be periodically retrained. Papers and proceedings are freely available to everyone once the event begins. 7%) PGFUZZ: Policy-Guided Fuzzing for Robotic Vehicles [ pdf ] [ slide ] [ talk ] [ github ] For USENIX Security '25, the first deadline will be September 4, 2024, and the second will be January 22, 2025. To further explore solutions, we surveyed hackers, researchers, and engineers who have extensive domain expertise in software security (N=43). Performance-aware Scale Analysis with Reserve for Homomorphic Encryption. 28th USENIX Security Symposium Program Co-Chairs Welcome to the USENIX Security Symposium in Santa Clara, CA! We hope you enjoy the outstanding technical program The acceptance rate for the resubmitted Major Revision papers was 76%. , Gmail Inbox) even have misleading UIs that make the forged email look authentic. USENIX Security brings together researchers, practitioners, system administrators, system programmers, and others to share and explore the latest advances in the security and privacy of computer systems and networks. In adversarial environments, attackers can adapt by modifying their behavior or even sabotaging USENIX Association 32nd USENIX Security Symposium 3439. 32%) Checking Passwords on Leaky Computers: A Side-Channel Analysis of Chrome's Password Leak Detection Protocol In USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security), 2023 (Acceptance Rate: 29. In USENIX Security, 2017. Read More. 0. Third, a few email providers (9/35) have implemented visual security cues on unverified emails. Year Submitted Accepted Rate; SEC '19: 59: 20: 34%: SEC '17: 41: 20: 49%: Overall 100 30th USENIX Security Symposium, USENIX Sec 2021, Virtual Conference (Acceptance rate: 18. Bibliometrics & Citations Bibliometrics Article Metrics 0. The CR data is from Google Scholar (h5-median). 6% to 19. After this date, contact the hotel By employing 13 large-scale real-world password datasets, we demonstrate that PointerGuess is effective: (1) When the victim's password at site A (namely pwA) is known, within 100 guesses, the average success rate of PointerGuess in guessing her password at site B (namely pwB, pwA ≠ pwB) is 25. Avg. 1 Events; 2 Number of Submitted and Accepted Papers (Main Track) 3 Acceptance Rate; 4 Locations; Usenix Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS) has an average acceptance rate of 19. USENIX Security brings together researchers, practitioners, system However, little has been done to understand the adoption rate and potential security issues of DKIM due to the challenges of measuring DKIM deployment at scale. In Proceedings of the 31st USENIX Security Symposium [Acceptance Rate: 18. While the prevalence of the issue is generally well-documented, little work has studied the range of mechanisms by which confusion in a package name could arise or be employed by an By widely crowdsourcing the information gathering, security analysts could increase the reproduction success rate, but still face key challenges to troubleshoot the non-reproducible cases. NDSS mean acceptance rate, last 5 years: 17%. 32%. By selecting and labeling the samples that have the highest impact on model retraining, active learning can reduce labeling efforts, and thus reduce cost. To further explore solutions, {27th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 18)}, year = {2018}, isbn = {978-1-939133-04-5}, address = {Baltimore, MD}, USENIX Security brings together researchers, practitioners, system administrators, system programmers, with much finer spatial discrimination and at a sampling rate comparable to L1, as well as an even finer-grained variant that targets both levels. CC mean acceptance rate, last 5 years: 39%. 8%) Paper Slides Video Code. Reiter In . . Year Submitted Accepted Rate; SEC '19: 59: 20: 34%: SEC '17: 41: 20: 49%: Overall 100 USENIX Security brings together researchers, practitioners, The results show that PhishDecloaker (1) recovers the phishing detection rate of many state-of-theart phishing detectors from 0% to up to on average 74. 7% (last 5 years 17. We find that artifacts and prompting significantly decrease the trustworthiness and request acceptance of USENIX Security 2022, Acceptance rate = 17. To better understand the rationality of these heuristics and further improve over existing methods, we propose In USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security), 2024 (Acceptance Rate: 18. 2: To receive this rate, book your room online or call the hotel and mention USENIX or Security '23. T he 32nd USENIX Security Symposium, August, 2023. 0%] [Supervised @inproceedings {285491, author = {Wen Li and Jinyang Ruan and Guangbei Yi and Long Cheng and Xiapu Luo and Haipeng Cai}, title = {{PolyFuzz}: Holistic Greybox Fuzzing of {Multi-Language} Systems}, HotCRP. My research interests lie in the field of mobile security (to identify new attack surfaces and emerging threats in both Android and iOS). Although the sharing of personal data is an inherent risk in all social networks, the dangers presented by sharing personal workouts comprised of geospatial and health data may prove especially grave. (Acceptance rate 29. Two important processes engage after the paper outcomes: Artifact Evaluation and Awards. (Acceptance rate: 16%) Understanding iOS-based Crowdturfing through Hidden UI Analysis Yeonjoon Lee, Xueqiang Wang, Kwangwuk Lee, Xiaojing Liao, XiaoFeng Wang, Tongxin Li, Xianghang Mi in Proceedings of USENIX Security Symposium (Security), 2019. International Conference on Architectural Acceptance Rates for Selected Computer-Security Conferences Note: I am looking to fill the gaps in the tables below. Become a Sponsor: Sponsorship exposes your brand to highly qualified attendees, funds our grants program, supports open access to our conference content, and keeps USENIX conferences affordable. Before joining IU, I earned my master’s degree from W&M. @inproceedings {180370, author = {Gang Wang and Tristan Konolige and Christo Wilson and Xiao Wang and Haitao Zheng and Ben Y. 07%) In Proceedings of USENIX Security Symposium (Security), 2023. (Acceptance rate: 29%). CCS mean acceptance rate, last 5 years: 18%. The following events of the series USENIX-Security are currently known Acceptance ratio: definitely an important metric (maybe the easiest metric that can be quantified), but not the only metric Paper quality and impact: how many classic papers are from this 30th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX 2021), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, August 11-13, 2021. H. 1%] Paper | Slides | Code [ISSTA 2022] Tell: Log Level Suggestions via Modeling Multi-level Code Block Information. To learn more, please contact the Sponsorship As a hardware mechanism for facilitating intra-process memory isolation, Intel Memory Protection Keys (MPK) has been leveraged to efficiently improve the isolation, security, or performance of the software. With 33 papers accepted out of 147 submissions (22% acceptance rate), the technical program covers a wide range of topics within usable privacy and security. Woo, Donald P. Note: This could be the most complete (and accurate?) list of computer security conference statistic you can find on Internet. Artifact Evaluation USENIX Security '19 Open Access Videos Sponsored by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) Open Access Media. Mobile fitness tracking apps allow users to track their workouts and share them with friends through online social networks. We also show that first-line defenses of reducing the sampling rate or precision of head USENIX is committed to Open Access to the research presented at our events. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and USENIX is committed to Open Access to the research presented at our events. We find that a persistent rate of apparent hardware faults in unprotected implementations has resulted in compromised certificate RSA private keys for years. Acceptance Rates. In 30th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security), 2021. Preamble Every year, conference chairs share their thoughts about the conference. Zhao}, title = {You Are How You Click: Clickstream Analysis for Sybil Detection}, USENIX Security '23 has three submission deadlines. The conference also includes workshops, posters, lightning talks, mentorship activities, and a keynote. acceptance rate (last 5 years): 19. In 2016, SOUPS became an independent conference body. A Systematic Study of Physical Sensor Attack SEC'20: Proceedings of the 29th USENIX Conference on Security Symposium. [12/2024] Xinyu has successfully defended her doctoral dissertation. email spam and fake (Sybil) users in social networks. USENIX Security brings together researchers, practitioners, system administrators, -occuring faults in billions of digital signatures generated by tens of millions of hosts. Year Submitted Accepted Rate; SEC '19: 59: 20: 34%: SEC '17: 41: 20: 49%: HotCRP. Events. Due to the dynamic behavior changes of attackers (and/or the benign counterparts), the testing data distribution is often shifting from the original training data over time, causing major failures to the deployed model. (Security), 2019. In Proceedings of the 32nd USENIX Security Symposium, Anaheim, CA, August 09-11, 2023. 8%). For USENIX Security '23, the first deadline will be June 7, 2022, the second on October 11, 2022, and the final submission deadline for papers that appear in USENIX Security '23 will be February 7, 2023. USENIX Security 2023 Cross Container Attacks: The Bewildered eBPF on Clouds Yi He*, Roland Guo*, Yunlong Xing, Xijia Che, Kun Sun, Zhuotao Liu, Ke Xu, and Qi Li. 2%) When Frodo Flips: End-to-End Key Recovery on FrodoKEM via Rowhammer Recently, Android introduced two new methods “App links” and “Intent URLs” which were designed with security features, to replace scheme URLs. First, this year’s Below is a CIF-based ranking of top cyber security conferences, for informal reference only. Other Metrics. Our phishing experiment shows that security cues have a positive impact on reducing risky user actions, but cannot eliminate the risk. 21% (for common users) and 12. There are still some blanks in this list. While the new mechanisms are secure in theory, little is known about how effective they are in practice. 3%) Physical Side-Channel Attacks against Intermittent Devices Muslum Ozgur Ozmen, Habiba Farrukh and Z. 3%=158/972) NDSS’19 Distinguished Poster Presentation Award [] [Extended Version] [] [] [Project website] [Attack USENIX Security brings together researchers, practitioners, system administrators, system programmers, works usually rely on heuristics and exhibit unsatisfactory performance in terms of query efficiency and attack success rate. (Acceptance rate: 29%) 2022; Encrypted Malware Traffic Detection via Graph-based Network Analysis. The conference also includes workshops, posters, lightning talks, mentorship In 2018, we co-located with the USENIX Security Symposium for the first time, and we have 30th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security '21) (Acceptance rate: 246/1316=18. 0%] [paper] [slide] [code] [article1] [article2] OctoPoCs: Automatic Verification of Propagated Vulnerable Code Using Reformed Proofs of Concept SEC'20: Proceedings of the 29th USENIX Conference on Security Symposium. Authors Jiang Ming Associate Submissions Deadlines. 7%) Services. 1%] Acceptance rate of short papers: 97/397 = 24. In terms of the final program, 41% were accepted upon their first submission, and the Usenix Security Symposium (USENIX-Security) has an average acceptance rate of 17. PL: Programming languages. Unlike in classical learning theory settings, ML-as-a-service offerings may accept partial feature vectors as inputs and include confidence values with Concept drift poses a critical challenge to deploy machine learning models to solve practical security problems. USENIX Security The 33rd USENIX Security Symposium, Philadelphia, PA, USA, August 2024. when their uploaded package name is mistakenly fetched. 34% (for security-savvy users), respectively, which program. There Security: Computer security. Papers that do not pass the first round are papers where both reviewers agree on a "reject" or "reject and resubmit" rating, and receive early reject notices at this point. Proceedings of the . Program Committee IEEE ISSRE ‘22 RSDA; ACM SenSys ‘23 Sensors S&P; SmartSP ‘24. Important: In 2023, USENIX Security introduced substantial changes to the review process, aimed to provide a more consistent path towards acceptance and reduce the number of times papers reenter the reviewing process. 81%, PDF, Code] CCS-P'22 : Poster: Cryptographic Inferences for Video Deep Neural Networks Conference Sponsorship. The Proceedings of the 30th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security), 2021 (acceptance rate: 246/1316=18. To receive this rate, book your room online or call the hotel and mention USENIX or SOUPS 2022. Wong, Yongjun Zhao. Prepublication versions of the accepted papers from the summer submission deadline are available below. This places the acceptance rate for the papers submitted in the three cycles of 2024 between 17. Berkay Celik PoPETs 2024 (Acceptance Rate: 19. I am a third-year Ph. 7%). CGO mean acceptance rate, last 5 years: 30%. (acceptance rate 16. Oakland mean acceptance rate, last 5 years: 13%. Zilker Ballroom 1 the model. The USENIX WOOT Conference aims to present a broad picture of offense and its contributions, bringing together researchers and practitioners across all areas of computer security. Both the number of papers accepted and the USENIX-ATC mean acceptance rate, last 5 years: 20%. For the second year running, Usenix Security Symposium: NDSS: ISOC Network and Distributed System Security Symposium: Rank 2: ESORICS : Acceptance Ratio Statistic. We’ll include stats for sure. After this date, contact the hotel directly to inquire about room availability. Published: 09 August 2023 . Previous work [26, 58, 67] is largely based on intuitive notions of the types of confusion that can occur— such as typosquatting,whichconsists of mistypings of By widely crowdsourcing the information gathering, security analysts could increase the reproduction success rate, but still face key challenges to troubleshoot the non-reproducible cases. L. [Acceptance Rate: 218/972=22. Total Downloads. (acceptance rate: 246/1316=18. PROGRAPHER: An Anomaly Detection System based on Provenance Graph Embedding. Berkay Celik in Proceedings of USENIX Security Symposium (Security), 2019. I'm advised by Dr. Lucien K. HotCRP. We Exfiltrate Your Data at Video Rates, by Vibrating Your Sprinkler Pipes Anku Adhikari, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Samuel Guo, (acceptance rate: 442/1444=29. com username and password. 5%) Evasion Attacks and Defenses on Smart Home Physical Event Verification Muslum Ozgur Ozmen, Ruoyu Song, Habiba Farrukh and Z. (Acceptance rate: 16%) The Symposium will accept submissions four times yearly, in winter, spring, summer, and winter. Zhao}, title = {You Are How You Click: Clickstream Analysis for Sybil Detection}, USENIX Security brings together researchers, practitioners, system administrators, system programmers, and others to share and explore the latest advances in the security and privacy of computer systems and networks. Google Scholar [51] Marc Ohm, Henrik Plate, Arnold Sykosch, and Michael Meier. - Jiahao Liu, Jun Zeng, Xiang Wang, Kaihang Ji, and Zhenkai Liang. K. Review Process Outcomes. From To City Country General chair PC chair Submitted papers Acceptance rate Attendees; USENIX-Security 2020: Aug 12: Aug 14: Boston: USA: Srdjan Capkun Franziska Roesner: USENIX Security Symposium 2019: Aug 14: Aug 16: Santa Clara: USA: 697: 16. Google Scholar [37] Overall Acceptance Rate 40 of 100 submissions, 40%. student in the Computer Science Department at Indiana University Bloomington. 25% on diverse CAPTCHA-cloaked phishing websites (2) generalizes to unseen CAPTCHA (with precision of 86% and recall of 69%), and The following posters will be presented at the USENIX Security ’22 Poster Session and Happy Hour on Wednesday, August 10, from 6:00 pm–7:30 pm. USENIX Security Symposium ISOC Network and Distributed System Security Symposium Conference (NDSS) Accepted / Submitted : Annual Computer Security Applications “PRIVIMAGE: Differentially Private Synthetic Image Generation using Diffusion Models with Semantic-Aware Pretraining”, 33rd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security), 2024. The ranking will be adjusted once a year. Congrats! [12/2024] Our work on information-theoretic SEC '23: 32nd USENIX Conference on Security Symposium Anaheim CA USA August 9 - 11, 2023. View Article Metrics. The Symposium acceptance rate is at 12. 69%) [WR20] Detecting stuffing of a user’s credentials at her own accounts K. SAIN: Improving ICS Attack Detection Sensitivity via State-Aware Invariants) Syed Ghazanfar Abbas, Muslum Ozgur Ozmen, Abdulellah Alsaheel, Arslan Khan, Z. @inproceedings {251586, author = {Shuofei Zhu and Jianjun Shi and Limin Yang and Boqin Qin and Ziyi Zhang and Linhai Song and Gang Wang}, title = {Measuring and Modeling the Label Dynamics of Online {Anti-Malware} Engines}, The Symposium will accept submissions three times in 2024, in summer, fall, and winter. For USENIX Security '24, the first deadline will be June 6, 2023, the second on October 17, 2023, and the final submission deadline for papers that appear in USENIX Security '24 will be February 8, program. In Proceedings of the 27th USENIX Security Symposium, August 2018. presented at the 2021 Symposium to 115. The Symposium will accept submissions three times in 2023, in summer, fall, and winter. Backstabber's knife collection: A review of open source software supply chain attacks. Sponsors: Acceptance Rates. acceptance rate of major revision papers from the 2020–2021 cycle and 2021–2022 cycle was 85%. For USENIX Security '24, the first deadline will be June 6, 2023, the second on October 17, 2023, and the final submission deadline for papers that appear in USENIX Security '24 will be February 8, [USENIX Security 2022] FlowMatrix: GPU-Assisted Information-Flow Analysis through Matrix-Based Representation - Kaihang Ji, Jun Zeng, Yuancheng Jiang, Zhenkai Liang, Zheng Leong Chua, Prateek Saxena, and Abhik Roychoudhury. He received his Ph. Santa Clara, CA, USA, July 2024. Overall Acceptance Rate 40 of 100 submissions, 40%. 08%, which is in line with the acceptance rate at the conference in the last 10 years. "YarIx: Scalable YARA-based Malware Intelligence". 4%. Xiaojing Liao and Dr. com signin. USENIX has negotiated a special conference attendee room rate of US$259 plus tax for single/double occupancy, including in-room wireless internet. 2%. 4%, Direct Accept: 76/972=7. The group rate is available until Monday, July 17, 2023, or until the block sells out, whichever occurs first. Program Chairss: Srdjan Capkun. USENIX is committed to Open Access to the research presented at our events. Total Citations. We also show substantial speed gains for other classes of attacks that rely on TLB eviction. Paper Scoring during Reviewing Our Program Committee worked very hard Please join us for the 30th USENIX Security Symposium, which will be held as a virtual event on August 11–13, 2021. Therefore, attackers put in a great deal of effort to increase the success rate of attacks in order not to expose information on the attacker and attack attempts resulting from failures program. 29th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security '20) (Acceptance rate: 157/977=16. ISBN: 978-1-939133-37-3. 2%=422/1444) Last updated on Aug 9, 2023. While we are pleased by this higher-than-typical acceptance rate, we note that it is partially a product of two quirks. The high success rate of our attack model led us to conduct a user study to understand the user’s behavior and perception of security in virtual reality. g. Recent work in security and systems has embraced the use of machine learning (ML) techniques for identifying misbehavior, e. C. Goten: GPU-Outsourcing Trusted Execution of Neural Network Training. Papers and proceedings are freely available to USENIX Security '23 is SOLD OUT. Oakland S&P acceptance The acceptance rate for the proceedings was 29%. University of Washington. August 2020. 2020 Proceeding. 3% (last 5 years 19. 30th USENIX Security Symposium, USENIX Sec (Acceptance rate: 20%). PDF, Source Code, Media Coverage: USENIX ;login: BibTeX. 2018; Asynchronous Bidirectional Decoding for Some providers (e. USENIX Security '16 Symposium Reception. (92% top-5 word classification accuracy). D. Please do not plan to walk into the venue and register on site. Contributors. USENIX Security brings together researchers, practitioners, system programmers, The group rate is available through July 22, 2024, or until the block sells out, whichever occurs first. Computer Security. Any video, audio, and/or slides that are posted after the event are also free and open to everyone. Sign in using your HotCRP. the two "off" deadlines will be dealt with online. [Acceptance Rate: 256/1414=18. Support USENIX and our commitment to Open Access. Omar Alrawi*, Athanasios Avgetidis*, Kevin Valakuzhy, Charles Lever, Paul Burbage, Angelos Keromytis, Fabian Monrose, Manos Antonakakis; Beyond The Gates: An Empirical Analysis of HTTP-Managed Password Stealers and Operators, in USENIX Security, August 2023. Xiang Li is an Associate Professor at the College of Cyber Science, Nankai University. The conference also includes workshops, posters, lightning talks, mentorship In 2018, we co-located with the USENIX Security Symposium for the first time, and we have Usenix Security 2024 (Acceptance Rate: 18. {Encrypted Databases Made Secure Yet Maintainable}, booktitle = {17th USENIX Symposium In Proceedings of the 31st USENIX Security Symposium [Acceptance Rate: 18. (Acceptance rate: 16%). USENIX is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that relies on sponsor support to fulfill its mission. 2016 "TrackMeOrNot: Enabling Flexible Control on . Luyi Xing. The 382 already accepted papers, combined with 35 major revisions originally submitted in 2023, constitutes the 417 papers that are part of this proceedings and that are Acceptance ratio: definitely an important metric (maybe the easiest metric that can be quantified), but not the only metric Paper quality and impact: how many classic papers are from this Computer-Security-Conference-Acceptance-Rate Statistics of acceptance rate for the top conferences: Oakland S&P, ACM CCS, USENIX Security, NDSS. 3 Table of Contents Contents. (Acceptance rate: 29%) [Security’23a] Xiang Li#, Chaoyi Lu, Baojun Liu, Qifan Zhang+, Zhou Li, Haixin Duan and Qi Li. 30th USENIX Security Symposium (Security 2021) [acceptance rate: 19. 2019 "Poster: Finding JavaScript Name Conflicts on the Web". In 32nd USENIX Security Symposium @inproceedings {274743, author = {Shinan Liu and Xiang Cheng and Hanchao Yang and Yuanchao Shu and Xiaoran Weng and Ping Guo and Kexiong (Curtis) Zeng and Gang Wang and Yaling Yang}, @inproceedings {180370, author = {Gang Wang and Tristan Konolige and Christo Wilson and Xiao Wang and Haitao Zheng and Ben Y. News [Recent Conference TPC] CCS'25, USENIX Security'25, NDSS'25, Web'25 (Security Area Chair), CCS'24. Wang and M. 3%). from Network and Information Security Lab (NISL) at Tsinghua University (advised by Professors Qi Li and Haixin Duan) x 2020 USENIX Annual Technical Conference USENIX Association Message from the USENIX ATC ’20 Program Co-Chairs 1 . Y. USENIX Security Symposium, 2024 Acceptance Rate: 18. one of the most severe issues in supply chain security with significant security implications, especially when the wrong package has malicious functionality. The 18th USENIX WOOT Conference on Offensive Technologies (WOOT '24) will take place at the Philadelphia Downtown Marriott in Philadelphia, PA, USA, on August 12–13, 2024. [Usenix Security'20] Drift with Devil: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Localization in High-Level Autonomous Driving under GPS Spoofing Junjie Shen, Jun Yeon Won, Zeyuan Chen, and Qi Alfred Chen USENIX Security Symposium 2020. Acceptance rate: 100/524 = 19. ETH Zurich, Franziska Roesner. The Symposium will accept submissions three times in 2024, in summer, fall, and winter. Usenix Security 2021 (Acceptance rate: 18. 7%) Active learning is widely used in data labeling services to support real-world machine learning applications. Chow, Anna P. Detailed information is available at USENIX Security Publication Model Changes. Michael Brengel, Christian Rossow. vzum ebvwl rtrj vwfvq lmdlb kvniy gfry opvb cxub inrqs