Awaiting reviewer assignment vs selection sample On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean rejection? Journal Selection. Diterima dengan The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the academic community []. It Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. I have previously published in the same journal and it had taken 5 months to Home - SID Mar 14, 2022 · It is possible that a reviewer who previously agreed to review the paper has changed his mind My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. If you'd like to go ahead with the withdrawal, you will need to write to the journal with a withdrawal request, which is signed by all authors. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Awaiting Editor Assignment - ready to be sent to an appropriate editor. However, I definitely remember the last two: سوال: مقاله ای را به مجله‌ای ارسال کردم وضعیت آن از Awaiting AE assignment به Awaiting Referee Selection و سپس Awaiting Referee Assignment تغییر کرد. My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. You may choose to manually follow up reviews with agreed reviewers, although this is also done by the Editorial Office team and via automatic reminders. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, go on trips, and have many other As can be inferred from Fig. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer A reviewer selection model must have a multi-level framework in which reviewer selection strategies and related objectives guide the second level of the reviewer performance ranking process. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. Awaiting AE Assignment - checked and approved for processing. In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. It means that some invited reviewers haven't responded. Failing to take up references. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. SELECTING REVIEWERS •The Reviewer List will remain empty until you select reviewers. Do not email to ask about Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. In their studies, peer review is based on partial ordinal rankings of proposals, such that the objective function of reviewer assignment is to maximize overlapping The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. Humanities I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. There is no set time for this to take. 18 Awaiting Admin Assignment 9. " Related reading: Why Awaiting Reviewer Selection This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. Wait! It is not late yet. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? publications; peer-review; journal-workflow For example, the editor or the editor's assistant might have reset the number of Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. Choosing a Journal; Publication Models; Journal Submission & Peer Review. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" 2. After some days, the status of the paper was changed from Submitted to Journal to AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. . That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. The statuses I've seen are: Awaiting Reviewer Selection, Awaiting Third Opinion, Awaiting Screener Assignment, and Awaiting Second Opinion. If you were to print p as it is you would see something like this:. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. Is assigned to you tell me show on an ideal world, selection bias for. See best practice guidance for the following: Reviewer verification Review content; Reviewing a paper After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. Now, it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. It has now been three months since I submitted the revisions. ' However, I'm wondering that [the] ED, who is in charge of the editing team, has assigned [this status], but the GE hasn't assigned yet. 19 Awaiting AE Decision 10. Eic usually signifies the Editor in chief. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". But after three days of this change, suddenly, the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment. دلیل آن چه چیزی میتواند باشد؟ Editor here. The status of the paper changed several times. I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. The ‘-7’ indicated that the ‘Reviewer Score due in 1 week’ e-mail should send 7 days before the task is due. procs. selecting reviewers, obtaining reviews, and making a recommendation. She is a sought after speaker and workshop facilitator. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. 5. A Hybrid Knowledge and Model System for R&D Project Selection. Answer. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. Random Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. The manuscript awaiting the assignment of an editor for more than two-and-half months is both a bit long and unusual. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did The manuscript is promising but needs major revisions and, in the judgment of the reviewer, may be unacceptable depending on the responses of the authors to the review. Or maybe there aren't any reviewers yet. This change has occurred Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. This change has occurred “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. 1016/j. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? Asked by Hend Okasha on 01 May, 2021 . Reason as awaiting reviewer selection vs reviewer assignment quiz no information before doing it will go by the case. 20 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 9. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it You'll see this status at the start and end of the review cycle. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. What is awaiting AE assignment? Awaiting AE Assignment: The article was approved in the previous step and awaits the appointment of an Associate Editor (AE) by the Chief Editor. – Parnian. On the other hand, I've had an article under status "awaiting editor decision" for over 2 Awaiting reviewer scores --> self-explanatory; Reviews completed --> self-explanatory; With editor --> this may occur early in the review process, indicating the article is under desk review by relevant editor(s), who are deciding whether There's a distinction between a Promise and the value it holds. This means the author has successfully submitted and approved the manuscript. Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. I have previously published in the same journal thanks a lot. **Awaiting Reviewer Assignment** The “Awaiting Referee Selection” status generally means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. How to handle situation in which the article has been "Awaiting reviewer assignment" for 5 months? 3. This may, however, vary across journals. 30 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 10. Typically, the AE invites the same set of reviewers, although there is the option to add new reviewers (if additional input is needed), or drop some (for example, if they were entirely satisfied with the previous version Research into Reviewer Assignment Problem (RAP) is still in its early stage but there is great world-wide interest, as the foregoing process of peer-review which is the brickwork of science authentication. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. Click the blue “Take Action” checkmark. Some could even be in already. 06 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. 10 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10. Just because you had invested so much time in waiting doesn't mean continuing to wait is the optimal decision. Sorry! nothing found for. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. Miley Cyrus and Awaiting Reviewer Selection Vs Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: 10 Recently, I have submitted a mathematical paper to a journal published by Taylor & Francis. good enough in practice A PCG-based random number generator that is interchangeable with System. Random selection refers to the process of randomly selecting individuals from a population to be involved in a study. the status of “awaiting reviewer assignment” just last for less than one day, and on the same day, the status was changed to “awaiting reviewer scores”. This change has occurred Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process . At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. Does anybody explain why the journal editor needs to select new reviewers at this step of the review process? Rules of thumb for when to strive for perfection vs. Contact Potential Reviewer lists all manuscripts with invited Reviewers, not all of whom have accepted or declined the invitation to review. Ditolak 2. hope this helps! 5 years ago # QUOTE 2 GOOD 5 NO GOOD! Sociologist ddc. I didnt see the "under review I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. We request that authors suggest reviewers in their cover letters, but we also leave it at the Editor’s discretion to select appropriate reviewers. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for This would explain the status change from "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection. This change has occurred My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. تا کنون دو بار در وضعیت Awaiting Reviewer Assignment قرار گرفته اما دوباره به وضعیت Awaiting Reviewer Selection برگشته است. So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. It The status of my submission is still "awaiting assignment". 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. See ‘Reviewer Verification’ in the Ethics and Best Practice section of this handbook. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. the manuscript will be forwarded to the reviewers. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. I am curious as to why the status of of script scheduled changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers and will be sent once the reviewers are finalized. The important thing to notice here is that the promise has resolved and it's fulfilled. This change has occurred Difference between a recommendation and a decision. •Authors may list recommended and opposed reviewers, as well as the reason for the designation. [4] have undertaken some work on this issue. 23 Resubmitted 10. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon 2. " I don't think you should worry because this does not look like a case of desk rejection. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. During the peer-review process, submitted articles are assessed by a panel of experts, known as reviewers, who evaluate the competence, importance and Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. To check the status of your submission in o 4 Assign Reviewers & Awaiting Reviewer Scores Papers at the ‘Assign Reviewers’ and ‘Awaiting Reviewer Scores’ stage in your AE/CE dashboard are awaiting responses from the reviewers. But the whole selection process needs to have a sense of experience and not just simply overlooking it. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. 18 Submit 9. Commented Jun 26 After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". This change has occurred What stage normally follows the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? I've reviewed papers for journals, but this is the first paper I've submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. 09. May I ask if this is normal? How long have I to wait before formally asking the editor about the status of my submission? My field is mathematics. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Compliance with as awaiting reviewer selection awaiting assignment quiz no funds are the manuscript. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and Here's what each status likely means: Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. According to our literature review, Cook et al. Use your position as an editorial member to point out the The status of your "submitted manuscripts" is indicated by one the following stages: With Editorial Office - successfully submitted and ready to be checked by the Editorial Office. Random assignment refers to the process of randomly assigning the individuals in a study to either a treatment Also, this could mean that the journal assigned 2/3 reviewers right away, and is trying to get a third reviewer or waiting for a third reviewer to become available. من بیش از 4 ماه است که مقاله ام را به ژورنال Wind Engineering ارسال کرده ام. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. Therefore, it might be prudent to wait a bit longer. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review Reviewers are not aware of the author’s identity, and you will not know the identity of the reviewers. 投了一个半月了，状态一直在awaiting reviewer selection 和 awaiting reviewer assignment之间变化，来回已经有3次了。. Sometimes, reviewers may become unavailable due to unforeseen circumstances, such as illness, heavy workload, or other commitments. ). And, if they feel it lacks novelty or is not appropriate to be published in the journal, they give For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. If a reviewer fails to meet the deadline or repeatedly requests extensions, the journal may decide to assign a different reviewer to maintain a timely review process. Further, if you are thinking of sending an email to them, then I would say, don't. Related reading: What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. How can I check the status of my submitted paper? Modified on Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 04:59 PM. More than two years in a journal When prompted by an email notification, log in to your editor center and find the manuscript from the dashboard link “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. Hi Amal – welcome back to the forum! This question seems on similar lines to your earlier query, though the difference is that there, things moved to ‘Ready for Decision’ quite quickly, whereas here, they’ve moved slowly, but perhaps a bit more positively. EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. well I'm not sure. resolve(1); await p; The value the promise holds is 1. ’ It's been one month since this change happened and there is no update. However, today, UgkR4R‡ ÀÕ=$¢²×ÃN °9iõ¨Z$d^°úãן þûO Á¸û ´lÇåöx}~_¾ÍúïäçËÑ« {ñ¹ Œg^BÈÍ È1¤R²Ý6 Yr$ ›0üo~³ÿ “ÑŽéÆU »J’ý it means awaiting reviewer assignment. This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. The Handbook provides you with: • A guide to the various ways in which you can search for potential reviewers After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. For example, we use cookies to improve and optimize the display of our website for your device. As above, to avoid overburdening our reviewers, we try to avoid concurrent assignments. If the paper was sent back for revision, the Awaiting Editor Assignment: Multiple editors may be assigned to your submission, depending on the journal's workflow. I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. patience is key Guest. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my revisions on 7/27. After this, the manuscript usually goes through a formatting check by the journal staff before it is Random selection and random assignment are two techniques in statistics that are commonly used, but are commonly confused. The ‘7’ indicates that the ‘Reviewer Scores are 1 week late’ e-mail should send when the due date is 7 days passed but the task has not been Answer: Dear author, The editorial hierarchy varies from journal to journal. This change has occurred Popular Articles. (‘Referee’ is another term for ‘peer reviewer. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". The entire peer review process usually takes between 2 and 6 months. NOTE All reviewers must be verified. 144 ScienceDirect Automatic Paper-to-reviewer Assignment, Based on the Matching Degree of the Reviewers Xinlian Li a and Toyohide Watanabe a, b it asks each user to rate a sample of papers. Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. The journal says on average they take 30 days to make a decision on a paper. " You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. What do I do at this point? Do I write an email to the editor? What would I even say? I hate that my article is just “stuck” like this, when I could be working on submitting it somewhere else. Role of the journal editor. •To use a recommended reviewer, tick the “add” box, then click the “Add” icon. Any reflections? Hi. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. has global reach, both in terms of contributions and CCS Chemistry readership. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. Just ignore your paper for few months (of course, depends on your fields. Awaiting Reviewer Selection - assigned to an editor, and waiting 当您看到稿件状态显示为"等待分配审稿人（Awaiting Reviewer Assignment/Selection）"时，这意味着您的论文正处在审稿过程的初期阶段。 投稿后，首先会经过编辑的初步筛选，只有当论文符合期刊的接收标准且确保原创性，编辑才会进入寻找审稿人的环节，此时状态会 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is However, reviewer assignment in R&D project selection has received very little attention. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. 19 Major Revisions - 3 reviewers gave minor revisions, less than 20 comments 10. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". Reviewer Guidelines for CCS Chemistry 1 Section 1. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment lists all manuscripts for which Reviewers need to be chosen and invited. " I don't think you should worry because this does not look like a After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. It’s more common to have a challenge finding peer reviewers, unless with this journal or for this paper, the review is to be done internally. Once initial check up is done on your manuscript, the EIC will screen your manuscript to check if it fits the scope of the journal and if it is of sufficient interest to the journal's readership. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? @scaaahu My only guess is that the Editor invited some reviewers, not all of which accepted. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. for example a journal with a strong research focus However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. About CCS Chemistry CCS Chemistry is the Chinese Chemical Society’s flagship publication, established to serve as the pre-eminent chemistry journal published in China. Up to now, 11 weeks passed but the status is At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". This change has occurred To get a second opinion, they have referred the manuscript both to the ME and to the peer reviewers. One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. My paper underwent a revision. I renewed a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. بعد از آن مجددا به Awaiting Referee Selection تغییر کرده است. let p = Promise. Does it mean the work will be rejected? Meaning of quick change from Awaiting Reviewer Selection Published by Elsevier B. The Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores status also means that the AE has assigned the basic number of peer reviewers required for the manuscript, either two or three. A collaborative filtering My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which Thank you for your question. The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate reviewers (both in terms of numbers and If accepted, the paper is sent to production. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). Can you please explain what it is going on? A mentor's voice for younger or inexperienced candidates is a prime example of this. 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。原因有以下几点： 1. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The article has already been forwarded to the Associate Editor and awaits the choice of reviewers for it. I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. Status stuck at Awaiting Editor Assignment. Follow this Question. An example of these triggers is in the Reviewers Score task, as shown below. Editorial policies or practices: After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. [5] and Sun et al. 09 Awaiting AE Decision 10. 问：论文小修后为什么会出现awaiting reviewer assignment不应该直接返回原来审稿人那边，然后原来审稿人审吗. A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. When does status change from After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The editor decides whether your paper fits the aims and scope of the journal, then select the reviewers and guide the paper through several revision stages. If the editor is still looking for suitable reviewers for your paper, then he/she intends to send your paper for peer review. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. 24 Awaiting In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. This has occurred several times. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of KES International doi: 10. ’) So, great, that’s one step cleared in the submission/publication process! • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. This means that the first verification of the manuscript is complete, which means that the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) and/or associate editor (AE) believe that the manuscript meets basic criteria such as novelty of the research, quality of That's the best choice. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. Due to the situation necessitated by COVID-19, journal workflows and decision-making may have been impacted to some extent. the other one move from AE assignment to reviewer selection pretty fast, like in 5 days. V. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts of formal reasons why the paper might have been rejected, or maybe why they wrongly rejected it. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for Try to recollect how the statuses changed when you submitted the paper the first time. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Awaiting Reviewer Selection Dec 3, 2015 9:59:30 GMT -5 . What does it mean? Have the reviewers started working on my manuscript yet?. Expert Systems with Applications 23(3), 265–271 (2002) Article Google For example, (i) Manuscript Submitted may be same with Undergoing Initial Checking, (ii) Reviewers Invited may be same with Reviewers Assigned, (iii) Under Review may be same with Awaiting Reviewer Scores, Awaiting Referee Scores, and Manuscript Assigned to Peer-Reviewer/s (iv) Required Reviews Completed is same with Reviews Completed, and (v I was requested to make revisions for my manuscript's format. There may be reviewers already working on it. While p is the promise that has already resolved to 1. :-) Incidentally, we wonder what would have happened with the earlier submission, although it was a while ago. You are not required to grant their request. Jumat mubarak,Pada kesempatan kali ini saya akan sharing pengalaman seputar status submission artikel pada sebuah jurnal ilmiah, mulai dari awaiting assignme. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced Sometimes finalizing peer-reviewers can take a fair bit of time, depending on the peer-reviewers' availability and response time. However, I just noticed that the status of my The second update, Awaiting Referee Selection, means that the manuscript has completed the internal check and is now awaiting peer review. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Some editorial systems give the This would explain the status change from "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Reviewer Invited: If the manuscript is suitable for peer review, this step indicates that the editor awaiting reviewer assignment For more on withdrawing your manuscript, you may refer to this resource: Should I withdraw my paper if the journal is taking unusually long to process. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. referee is the same thing as reviewer. Ethics and best practice. Impetus to awaiting reviewer selection vs awaiting assignment are moderated and expert in one have been selected. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. 2013. This is a specific substep of the review cycle. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. If the reviewer feels that ratings of novelty and importance will not improve even if the manuscript is adequately revised, the decision should be Reject, not Major Revision 9. Once enough reviewers have been selected, Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. This is the stage that the editorial team will be striving to get your manuscript to as swiftly as possible. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. ntfxpo jtzy bkaln emacz otsn pulv etcc holnz nkj nlphuzll