Rmteam x265 vs x265 reddit. However, now there’s no issue.
Rmteam x265 vs x265 reddit The normal H265 takes way too much time so I'd rather avoid that. 264 are encoding standards. Question I have a 1080p tv and 4k content seem to have more details than 1080p content. Find out Plex direct streams 264 out the box and that 265 is hardware dependent. 0 I looked around and looks like RmTeam makes the best (and smallest) x265 rips of videos (Tv, Movie) View community ranking In the Top 10% of largest communities on Reddit. You don't see a difference between a 4gb 264 file and 2gb 265 file because they're both almost the lowest quality level for each respective codec. Even the RARBG release is already around ~2GB for 1080p x265, and that not best quality enough for some people. X265 10bit can he played back on capable hardware and in new generation tv's only. For Speed : RMTeam - http://rmz. Also BvS rips or MegaDDL. they probably have the exact same quality and amount of info, the difference is that the h265 file size will be smaller, but will use much more processing to decode. I don't think anyone's done a detailed analysis of Ampere-based NVENC vs. The x265 ones work on 1 of . Question/Advice I'm in the process of updating some of my media. 1 audio), you may end up liking x265. Or check it out in the app stores TOPICS And some times rmteam idk y Heteam for tv It's a good compromise between file size and quality. Valheim; Genshin Impact; Minecraft; 2160 x265 vs 1080p x264 on 1080p TV . For 1080p30 I'd pick 50 mbit MPEG2, 35 mbit h264 or 20 mbit h265. It will likely be in h264 or h265 for the codec. Source is my original camera video files from Sony A7Rii - 100MBPS X-AVCS @ h264. You probably wouldn't notice a quality difference between that and a good rip to a lossier format, but potentially in the future there will be superior formats that you may wish to use and you will get better results encoding from the original than transcoding from, say, x265. The ONLY significant difference is time, with the intel cutting down the time by half to more. x265 2160p SDR releases are larger in file sizes, and I have found that SDR just seem to have a lot brighter colours and more vivid than HDR releases of the same thing, or am I wrong? Negative of SDR: I have found that most SDR Releases mention that they are converted from HDR? H265 is the codec, X265 is your processor’s encoder which can only encode h265. Proton Pass is a free and open-source password manager from the scientists behind Proton Mail, the world's largest encrypted email service. Interesting. 0 vs GCC 6. I used to be against it, because I found it more limited in terms of ways to play it. & it's possible to have size&quality by turning up the x265 analysis settings to the max so that it spends more time analyzing the video to encode it more efficiently. The exact quality difference can vary depending on the content and encoding settings, but AV1 is typically able to deliver 20-30% better compression efficiency compared to x265. The higher the quality of your original video the less advantage h265 make. x265 comparisons and i don't like the subtle blending that x265 is doing. x264 HD rips are typically the way a tv show is originally encoded and distributed, so an x264 AMZN version is often 'the original'. Objectively, it's not. We are Reddit's primary hub for all things modding, from It's very much between other codecs in terms of performance. efficiency. However I do feel that what x265 excels at is with compression at higher resolutions (naturally) than x264. /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app In video gaming the benchmarks are all over the place but for 1080P it seems the difference between the 2 is usually around 50% with the range being usually 40-60% faster with it being rare to see more than 60% speed increase. Some people appreciate quality. If you're asking whether b-frames will help with color banding, it depends upon the complexity of the scene--but any help they'd offer would be minimal. H265 is a format while x264 is a program. All in x265. My zcam records h265 in 10 bit and I’ve read that Medium Quality that is essentially the equivalent of ProRes 422. x265 rips are great for collections, since it's so H. All three post their releases on 1337x and Ettv. Welcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M, and RF Mount interchangeable lens DSLR and Mirrorless cameras, and occasionally their Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I've also encoded some using just the x265 preset and have noticed good results with some artifacts. If you are encoding to x265, for the love of god, do it from the source file. Wrong. Experienced encoders don't care and just use whatever that suits their boat because well, it doesn't really matter much other than speed. Make sure you use the NVenc encoder if you have a recent Nvidia GPU. Archived post. com. I stream to FireSticks around the house and they take it no problem. If disk space isn't an issue, then an archival copy would be a bit-for-bit exact clone of the original disc. x265 is a more efficient and therefor less of a filesize. The storage space you save can be huge. I don't know how its quality is. In this case the x265 means the person reencoded the remux, lowering the quality, in order to make it h265 and lower the size. Same quality (unless it's a re-encode, but that's another debate), smaller size. X265 has no problem as such when encoded at 8bit but problem arises when x265 is in 10bit. But if you are creating both x265 and x264 from a raw source file, then there is no reason the x265 would have poorer quality. As a comparison, x264 was started around 2005, and it has almost finished development around 2013. Is there an easy answer to why when I get an x265 encoded file it hangs halfway through playing it? (this is reproducible across a dozen different files) Where if I go and get the x264 version of the file - it works perfectly. The 4K I’ve considered saving space and sanity and just going for 4K x265 encodes and using the roku again, but can’t find much information on bitrate size vs the remux 4K. You can read more about it here. ShaNnIig is also too old and not up to date. There's a definite pattern with Quality, with X265 usually being lower CRF to CRF. x264 and x265 are not codecs, they're libraries used to encode to a codec (h264 or h265). Sort by: x265 2160p HDR releases are lower in file sizes and have more seeds. Now I have been using the PSA and RMTeam releases and also the BvS. Mainly, it can compress areas of 64x64 pixels into a single block, vs 16x16 for H. I think that x265 is the sweet spot. You could choose to have files with identical size and the x265 would have better quality, or files with identical quality and the x265 would be smaller, or any other variation you like. So while encoding to h. its not that x265 is bad, its going from a lossless codec to another lossless codec thats bad. Out with the old, in with x265 will surely cut down your storage letting you add more contents, but using with Plex, it may cause a problem if your client has to transcode the x265 to x264. Or check it out in the app stores TOPICS. AV1 is royalty free and would save websites millions or even billions of dollars. So no, a 1. mp3 did. Which is better as output when upscaling an 8-bit fhd video to 4k? 8-bit h265 main? or 10-bit h265 main10 Share Add a Comment. Disclaimer: I'm a maintainer of a x264 modded version, and a x265 modded version, and a contributor of x265 project. Well, honestly, I don't think I've ever noticed any quality loss with H264 at all. However the difference should be discernible, just if you are one to pay attention to the small details a lot. You set x265 to a very high quality metric at the expense of a ton of storage. Vp9 is not. They are all hdr unless noted (all 4K disc are hdr now), but encoders aren't always the most honest on public sites. The ~8gb x264 and the ~5gb x265 will look pretty close. HEVC compresses better. x265 achieves, on average, 2x the compression of x264. Typically you'll want to match quality or file size to get a reasonable point of comparison. And at lower bitrates, the fidelity is pretty much indistinguishable. Perhaps a suggestive placebo effect though. Gaming. The x264 ones work everywhere. I will check out the others. crazy4tv/heteam is good too. I've been using the x265 10-bit preset and have had good results. If you want to save internet data, use RARBG Release or pahe /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind users from Still x265 in 2019 is in its early stage. x265 is used widely in production. For 4k60, I'd go with 60 mbit h265 over 100 mbit h264. This is absolute bollocks. As a result so many people and trackers looked down on H265 encodes for a long time. I then just noticed, for the first time, that I am able to encode also at h265, so I changed the setting to h265, left the encoder at the default of "NVIDIA", and the final result looked exactly the same as the h264 file but was only 923 megs. For my next round il do preset 3 with more samples (~12) and compare: X265 CRF 24 vs AV1 CRF 25 But I do want to make the argument that x265 is not like it was 7 years ago. Everyone keeps saying "significantly" but when I encode with x264 and x265 i can only get about a 10-20% reduction using x265 over x264 before the x265 quality drops below the x264. By looking at the last two Graphs it seems that a Quality Value of ~30-35 should be considered for 1080p Film content. h264 delivered. 264 is by far the most common codec in use, and thus it is the most widely supported across different plex clients. A file of exact same size and length would have double the “quality” in x265. x264 and x265 are the encoders (that's the difference between h. The x265 project is based on the x264 code so they're very similar to one another, though obviously they implement different encoding. However, I downloaded some x265 video files and when I tried playing it with my usual media player of choice (Pot Player/VLC) it doesn't play the files but rather crashes it. I found that using same crf value, the output of preset fast and faster looks pretty similar to my eyes, but with different filesize (the faster preset yields slightly smaller filesize). x265 and x264 is software that encodes video to those standards. 41 gigs. 0 (Most likely the cause) FFmpeg version. So I guess my question is, are there certain situations where I should use one preset vs the other? The x265/H265 software encoders automatically incorporate b-frames into their presets, or you can tweak them using advanced options. Something labeled as HEVC or h265 usually means it is not encoded, but a raw remux or webdl. x265 10 bits is the best actually (2022)! Vastly superior to x264 and x265 8 bits, way more compatible than in the past (Youtube, Facebook, everybody accept those nowadays, most new players too) and the extra color space gives you so much power on night and low light level scenes (where you need thousands variations of dark colors). Beyond a certain bit rate, other settings are going to effect the quality more. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing I mostly download 4K remuxes, but when I'm watching a 4K x265 encode I can't tell the difference. Now, the difference between the H. I read somewhere (don't ask, I can't find it) that whatever methods x264 uses it is better at grain encoding at similar bitrate than x265. There are definitely test clips where vp9 scores higher on metrics but generally x265 does better from what I’ve seen. But x265 seems to play better on Plex + older SmartTV or mobile devices for me. Or check it out in the app stores TOPICS RMteam no idea Reply reply SeriousDisaster Joy is another awesome x265 encoder Reply reply When I use -e x265 the output file takes 10 seconds befoe it all syncs and plays properly When I use -e x265_10bit it's all fine, does anyone have any information on this, here's the complete command HandBrakeCLI -i IN. But a ~2gb x265 Joybell release is gonna look way worse than an ~8gb x264 FGT copy. For it to happen at all, the new codec needs to be /much/ better than the old one. 264 vs h. That's only the current hardware encoded AV1 that is just behind software encoded x265 with archival settings (but much faster to encode and no Ip issues). They offer both x264 and x265. 8 vs 3. As for x264 vs x265, these are software projects that are fairly widely used in programs like FFmpeg or HandBrake. Valheim; Genshin Impact; Minecraft; h265 main VS h265 main10 . mp4 -w 640 -e x265_10bit --encoder-preset ultrafast -q 26 Ok Imma try my best I'm looking at aset of a dvd show remastered and there are two options to pick from x264 and x265 10bit. NVenc is a hardware encoder (uses dedicated encoding hardware on GPU), and is designed mostly for screen recording/streaming, and so speed is its main objective. cr. While the lossless remux releases are ideal if you’re a quality purist, the differences between that and a 20Mbps bitrate x265 encode are imperceptible in motion. 264 is a very widely supported standard that's been around a long time. H265 is a codec, its a type of compression. x265 10-bit veryslow vs slower vs slow I made the mistake of encoding my whole library with x264 10-bit, so now I need to re-encode all of it. I am aware of RMTeam and PSA. All will give the same video quality. Of course, not every implementation of a codec is as good as an implementation for that encoder can be. 9fps on slower. But then require x265 with 4k content Why would that be? Does x265 mean more loss of quality with lower resolutions ? Why should you not do x265 with say 1080p content ? My understanding was that x265 was just better overall to preserve more quality with less size, and that the only reason to use x264 was for device compatibility. So a video using x264@2500kbps, you would only need x265@1250kbps for the video to be of relatively equal quality. Totally noob question of course, but I want to make I'm not being a total nitwit using wrong settings etc Normally I use x264 codecs for compression. Or check it out in the app stores x265 version. But I did try to work something out for you: In terms of speed at default settings: NVENC > x264 > x265 AV1 vs H265 . New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. GPU encoding will always be worse quality than CPU encoding, but if CPU encoding doesn't noticably hurt your framerate (and it shouldn't, with that CPU) it won't cause any further problems. 2. If you encode a video to both H264 and H265 using settings that produce similar results, the h265 file should be smaller. 1-Pass 8bit vs 2-Pass 8bit vs 1-Pass 10bit vs 2-Pass 8bit As expected, 10bit > 8bit. I think hdr is the key to quality and makes even an encode worth watching over a 1080p remux. It is not reencoded compared to the bluray, its the same thing but as an mkv. Better Call Saul 1080p S05 x265 from RARBG is 8gb in size and all the subtitles are in a separate folder Better Call Saul 1080p S05 x264 from ITSALLGOODMAN is 55gb but the foreign subtitles are baked in Then there is a Better Call Saul S05 BDRip x265 from ION265 is 3. This is the appeal of x265 and why it is used for UHD content like UHD BluRay discs. H. However, now there’s no issue. Help with bitrates and x264 vs x265 . I have some media that is around 6mb to 8mb bitrate. So I get a crash course in x264 vs x265. UTR. How is x265's file size so much smaller and has so much lower bit rate than NVENC? EDIT: I understood the trade-offs between size/quality regarding x265 vs NVENC, and knew NVENC was going to produce a bigger file. When you can take a 1080p video that is 33GB and use x265 to reduce it to 9. Encoding Speed: Historically, x265 has had an advantage in encoding speed compared to AV1. I would in general target a VMAF Value of ~96. Although, certain episodes do seem to get some washed out colors occassionally. The encoder makes a significant difference in high speed game footage. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. 4 vs 4. 264 encodes simultaneously and still get more movies encoded per unit of time compared to h. I have performed multiple encode tests targeting an average bitrate and the relative filesize is almost always the same between H265 intel QSV and x265. 1 and 5. 4GB x264 video will not look the same as a 700mb x265 video, x265 will look worse. HEVC is h265 which is not the same as x265. It doesn't make sense to me, but looking at some of my older encodes, before I switched to x265, I was thinking they don't look bad for the file size. 42gb and the subtitles are in a separate folder like before. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if Both x265 and NVENC can produce great looking video. 265 are video codecs for compressing image frames to video. 8bit Film Sample. edit subscriptions. i think the general claim is that x265 will produce the same quality image compared to x264, but at half the bitrate. It's supposed to be a replacement for the "old", but widely supported and used H264. Whereas traditional frameworks like React and Vue do the bulk of their work in the browser, Svelte shifts that work into a compile step that happens when you build your app. i'm on shit internet lately (1. PSA - http://psarips. I looked around and looks like RmTeam makes the best (and smallest) x265 rips of videos (Tv, Movie) I was wondering, do any of you know what settings I have to use to get close to similar Posted in r/Piracy by u/Mark_Knight • 679 points and 128 comments my subreddits. Encoding Time SVT-AV1 in Seconds Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Consider joining r/PlayStation for your daily dose of memes, screenshots, and other casual discussion. H265 by nature is designed for streaming (the likes of Netflix, Disney+ and such) so the lower the bitrate the better the encoder actually becomes compared to H264. Posted by u/ImTheRealSpoon - No votes and 7 comments there is a difference. The easiest way to tell the difference is by flipping between them on a computer. But if you consider size to quality ratio then x265 movie is good to go. co PSArips are also good, along with Pahe for movies and shows. Remuxes of 1080p blurays are either MPEG-2, VC-1 or H264. And if the x265 was made from the x264, then the x264 will be even better. H265/HEVC is a video codec. That being said, EposVox did a comparison of quality between Turing NVENC and x265 a few months ago, and the NVENC encoder produced very good quality conversions, not to mention that it's very fast. 265, not on the features of x264 vs x265. x265 CRF vs Constant bitrate - File size vs quality observations . world/c/av1 due to changes in Reddit policies. 264 and H. The extra ~25GB of storage space required for a remux isn’t worth it for me. If RMTeam or HeTeam gives good x265 720p/1080p tv shows. IMHO, I have run some x264 vs. so same bitrate x265 as a x264 should be the same quality but x265 be a smaller file size You can't have the same bitrate and a smaller size. 265 means I can fit 2,000 movies on a hard drive instead of 1,500 with h. 265 is more efficient at storing data. (Correct me if I’m wrong) I can record significantly longer in h265. Still x264 at best encode setting can beat x265 at best. In this case the x265 Question: I did some close up comparisons of the videos, and the quality of the x265 file is pretty comparable to what NVENC produced. So there is no way of comparing as X264 and X265 are cpu encoding NVENC and AMD-VCE gpu encoding. 265 and H. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing; Animals & Pets; Cringe & Facepalm 1080p x264 vs 720p x265 . Switching to H265 NVEnc is twice faster, and the file size is about 1/3 smaller. Tried to get my head around the difference between x265 over x264 and my research suggests x265 can save a lot of HDD space with smaller size files with same quality. But h264 is good enough that it's harder to justify moving to h265. The GPU in question is a 1080ti but I have access to a 4070ti if the NVENC is substantially different between them. I wanted to try the x265 for a change and used similar settings as I would with x264 x265 these days. x265 vs x264 problems . 264, it's a hell of a lot faster to just add another hard drive to get the space back rather than waiting for the The developer of x264 and x265 did initially scale ratefactor (RF value) on x265 to be roughly equivalent to the same value in x264 However, in practice the two are very unlikely to be equivalent because the codecs are different enough that the effect of rate factor in certain scenes and sources can be very different between the two. 264 (which is not a big deal because resolutions and therefore pixel densities are rapidly improving). x265, the encoder, is pretty serviceable, for a codec implementation in that generation. popular-all-random-usersAskReddit-pics-funny-moviesmovies- Both x264 and x265 encoders can use a quotient from the depths of their algorithms, called "rate factor", which is relatively good, but unfortunately you can't easily I prefer 1080p content but x264 WEB-DL takes up a lot of disk space whereas x265 1080p content is 50% smaller and is very easily available now with the rise of 4K and 4KHDR content, just use the following search parameters to narrow your results: subreddit:subreddit find submissions in "subreddit" author:username find submissions by "username" So, two things. so it takes shortcuts and requires a higher bitrate to H265 and x264 are different things. The whole point of h265 is to get better quality for the same bitrate (and thus file size) or similar quality at a lower bitrate (smaller file size). 3 Compiler version. NVENC is nvidia’s encoder which can only encode h264. An H265 file at 15Mbps doesn't look ANYWHERE close to an H264 file The quality of x264 is about the same as x265 at half the bitrate. Now the file size difference is the 265 is a little bigger by like 50mb and I've looked them side by side and the bitrate for the 265 is only higher in certain spotsnow my question is should I download the 264 or 265 There might be a better answer for it, but what I think is that x265 is just extremely mature, it's been worked on for over a decade at this point, and the presets, defaults, etc are all solid. Put differently, you need half the bitrate in an x265 stream to achieve the same visual results as an x264 stream. Pass brings a higher level of security with battle-tested end-to-end encryption of all data and metadata, plus hide-my-email alias support. 265. Once h265 is established, will the commercial case for h266 be justified? It might just be a bad RoI. They are all Samsung TVs of pretty much the same age. 265 is not supported on major websites because of royalties. The Reddit home for PlayStation 5 - your hub PS5 news and discussion. I'd recommend sticking with x264 as it is most common and supported. I compared x264 720p files with x265 1080p files and there was no contest. 0. At this bitrate, will there still be obvious visual differences between NVENC vs x265? I'm using a i5-6600k @ 4. software x265 yet. 5mb) so x264 and x265 are not codecs, they're libraries used to encode to a codec (h264 or h265). X265 vs x264 compression time requirement . 3. 69GB with little to no difference in visible quality, along with two large untouched audio tracks (7. Is there a 10-bit setting for AV1? Or is it only 8-bit? //lemmy. 4. So dont always assume "all-i 600mbps is 3 times better than h265 200mbps". I included 1 for fun research and preset 2 to see what kind of decrease in file size AV1's lowest practical preset has over X265's lowest practical preset. I just rendered a 7 minute video in mp4 h264 as I always do. x265 10-bit is a bit better though if you’re looking for compression and smaller file size. Just my experience with x265. H265 excels at low bitrate files, but at high bitrate there's virtually no difference between the two. 32 votes, 32 comments. Sparks was busted so don't expect new releases. Otherwise you aren’t losing much. But the bitrate of the H265 NVEnc video is lower than the 264 one. GCC 8. Being royalty-free is both advantage and disadvantage for AV1 and the future AV2. I encoded the file slower and slower to try and 32 mbps is enough to look good and you won’t really notice much of a difference. 265 is obviously that H. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. I had to set the quality to 30 to get the file size even close, any lower crf would give me a file between 900mb and 5gb. The myth of "HEVC can halve the size of AVC encodes" has led to a swarm of very bad H265 micro encodes that lack enough bitrate and were full of artifacts. To do this it employs a few tricks. Understood that now x265 is getting popular but many technologies are yet to implement the support for it. It provides good efficiency. AV1 has better video quality compared to H. AV1 will by far take the longest, but it will give you a much smaller file size. Remuxes are usually x265, because why not. 1. 26* vs x. So 10GB x264 will have better image quality than 3GB x265. Final file size was 6. Hi, I wonder what is the best codec for archival between h264 or h265, which codec will be easily readable by devices in 10 or 20 years ? h264 is widespread these days and h265 comes slowly to replace it (I can only read h265 on computer, my smartphone and my TV can't read it), I think it will easily readable in a few years but is h265 will last as long as h264 ? That is not remotely true, I'm sorry. The choice between them should be based on h. I think there is some sort of noise reduction going on with x265 which makes it throw away a hair of detail like . That said, you may not notice any difference at all. You can also use svt with preset 4 or 5 and be much more efficient than x265. There are countless tests and comparisons between the two, and what you're saying goes against every one of them. But at THAT point I can just run two h. Svelte is a radical new approach to building user interfaces. x265 is a program used to encode to h265. Now I am trying x265 and experimenting with crf 20 - 24 and preset fast to veryfast. I have a Ryzen 5900x and I still get roughly 2fps on the x265 10-bit veryslow preset and 3. The unofficial but officially recognized Reddit community discussing the latest LinusTechTips, TechQuickie and other LinusMediaGroup content x265 17RF is the same as AV1 25RF for constant quality, assuming all other settings the same, and speed set to medium (x265) and 5 (AV1) No and it's not even close. This advantage is especially noticeable at higher resolutions and bitrates. That being said, if you can’t use HEVC for some reason, but have the ability to use vp9, use it! It’s dramatically better than x264 in most cases. If something is labeled as x265 is it encoded. x265 at 7yo is by no mean untested. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Look at it this way: Higher efficiency in x265 means that a 1GB x265 will look better than a 1GB x264 video. It's just NVENC will need a higher bitrate than x265 to match it. However, I have an odd problem with x264 AVC MKV vs x265 HEVC MKVs. Is that a fair assumption to make? Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. 2Ghz, paired with GTX1060 3GB and 16GB RAM. 10-20% smaller files dont come close to making up for the significantly higher encoding time and much less supported playback. true. 26*). If there are other good video / x265 groups, say. Example: a 720 x264 will be 900mb, but the x265 will be 200mb. A ~5gb x265 encode from Silence or Afm72 or somebody is going to look way better than a ~2gb x264 RARBG or YTS encode. I'm not sure what that means quite yet but as I'm scouring for playback issues realize that's the difference between the movies that play smoothly and the newer content I've downloaded that constantly buffers. I do 8k 3D VR180 and I usually use H265 NVidia MAIN10 because it's 10-bit. teiq lkpnzwh cyjsrp qvs oieyaoio zlmzfer crjvsy jtmew pphny rugwnkkh