Siril vs dss. HDD's are cheap, so I don't see that as an issue.
Siril vs dss Sequator is pretty good to start off with but wasn't aligning perfectly on my images, hence the switch to DSS. I feel like Siril got the best of me. 4. I totally get your remark about the instructions! If it is substantially better than DSS however, I would appreciate hearing in what ways it is better. Post by Carles » DSS and Siril, when open the file in AutoDev, has an strong yellow cast before Wipe. Why? Story goes like this: I started my new hobby with 130SLT alt_az and ASI385MC. For best results the image should be in . 0. But what I needed was a short, Anybody use ASTAP or Siril for image stacking? - posted in DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging: I have been using APP (Astro Pixel Processor https://www. In this video I will go over my current workflow for Deep Sky Object processing using Siril, Starnet++, DeepSkyStacker and Photoshop. Processing times: APP: ~13 min. I got ~3 hours of subs after deleting those with clouds and #$&%*&# starlink trails and prepared to process them in DSS. astropixelprocessor. 02, for what its worth I used to use DSS for stacking, but making it work on my Linux PC with WINE went Hi Dennis, just to make sure, I suppose you mean Siril and Deep Sky Stacker. 6 exist, and it seems to support D810A better than 3. Just a very brief overview of a comparison I did for no other reason than I had a few minutes to kill. Interesting topic. Works much better than afterwards. DSS: ~ 5 min. **Stacking in DSS vs Stacking in Siril** Ciao, ho appena messo le mani sulla nuova versione di Siril (1. However, since Siril’s implementation of StarNet converts the images, I’ve had success running the star reduction script against other formats as well such as tif and jpg. But a vast majority of users do not know how to use it. 5 released on November 22, 2024. SeeStar S50 stock image results versus stacking/processing by experienced astrophotographers Finally the 4th was a combination of Gimp and Siril SeeStar S50 Google Image save the uncombined source images, align and combine in DSS, save as TIFF, extract the red, green, blue data, extract the photometric data from the green I did use DSS and Siril. M81 & M82, taken on May, 2015. HDD's are cheap, so I don't see that as an issue. Plus, I can do background extraction before stacking. Sequator I use for landscape astrophotography when there is a foreground to maintain. For pure speed and quality of stacks, Siril cannot be beat though. Not sure that many folks are still using DSS. The registration algorithm between the two isn't even close. Siril has added a great deal of features and functionality since I began using For programs like DSS and Siril and even PixInsight, the code to manage that Raw Decoding is libRAW - which a non-profit group works to maintain and releases a few updates to their libRAW. The only feature I'd like to see in Affinity is more control over image selection. 8. I Have not changed the white balance or anything in DSS, actually disabled any sort of white balance as per the manual too. If there are no further updates, support for later cameras As per my earlier comment, DSS is pretty automated and in my opinion it provides subtle inferior images. I can bring the stacked image into siril for the initial post processing. That said, I have used Siril since I began our hobby. The images are messy but these are purely stacks including usual cal bobharmony wrote: ↑ Sun Mar 28, 2021 6:15 pm Carles I have just begun working with Siril as an alternative to DSS this past week, and am also liking what I am seeing so far. DSS is fast. 1 Seelive. The Z7ii has been out for a few years, so it is surely covered by a modern libRAW version. 9 of Siril appeared a new feature: the scripts. Post by Carles » Mon Mar 22, 2021 7:08 pm. Will be great to hear peoples thoughts on my DSS vs Siril versions of this image. In my area, I regularly get haze and high wispy clouds at night. Page 2 of 3 - Siril a better DSS alternative? - posted in DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging: The latest version is 3. Hello all, I'm trying out these three softwares for stacking my files to see if I get better results with one or the other. 11. Post by Carles » Do you know what DSS does in the background? Might be worth finding out to see if there is similarity or differences in how it might be done with PI. Check out the downloads page. My system is no slouch. I've changed it in Siril, DSS too. It was made with version 0. Two popular choices in the astrophotography community are Siril and PixInsight. even down to just one. There is only a small amount of data (about 30 mins) on M81 at the heart with M82 and NGC 3077 off to upper sides. Pretty soon it became clear, that getting quality data with this Hi Troy, thank you for your insights about Siril I'm happy with Siril for stacking, and usually don't run into problems. But no problem, NINA can DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. Page 2 of 2 - Stacking: APP vs Siril vs PI vs DSS vs ASTAP - posted in Experienced Deep Sky Imaging: My $. Name each appropriate folder as 'darks', 'flats', 'biases', 'lights'. I cannot acces the Pixinsigth page as I use Siril for most stacking. 0 to stack and it's way better! It's a lot faster and can manage stack without calibration frame way better than Dss! Pixinsight for processing, and finishing Introduction # Genesis # In June 2018, with version 0. 30 posts Previous; 1; 2; 3; Carles Posts: 152 Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 5:06 pm. As a matter of fact in Siril manual it is also stated that you should expect inferior results if you use scripts exactly for that reason, because it's automated. Few months later I upgraded my rig to AVX and 294MC PRO and problems dissapeared. Step 0. 26 - posted in Experienced Deep Sky Imaging: After 5 months of solid clouds, we got our first break night before last, and I set my sights on the Casper the Friendly Ghost nebula. Post by Carles » 19K subscribers in the AskAstrophotography community. Then I discovered Sirilic, which is a script building tool that greatly simplifies stacking in Fortunately I discovered, that SIRIL was able to eat everything I feed to him and gave me a proper stack. Good luck. Siril 1. Download SIRIL version 1. But I'm curious if you're using Siril's scripts to stack or if I've tried all 3 and found DSS to work the best. Any thoughts? I've used Siril, PI, APP, DSS and Sequator and I can say for sure in my case, Siril is by far the fastest of all if them (APP easily the slowest). DSS came out as no 3. DSS output file format (fits vs tiff) - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Im using DSS to stack and was just curious if there is a benefit to using one file output format over the other. I haven't tried PI or APP, but for my use, Siril and PS suffice. Post by Carles » Got 200 light frames (180s each) of Heart nebula (20 darks, bias, flats). The "s" on the end is important for the scripts to work. clear sky at night). 30 x matching darks. No idea but worth giving Siril a go see how that compares . The DSS and Siril, when open the file in AutoDev, has an strong yellow cast before Wipe. No calibration. Is anyone aware of the appropriate settings in DSS to mimic it? I ask because I have a few under exposed stacks at about 1/8 histogram that Sequator stacks well (ends up Page 1 of 2 - Pixinsight vs DSS - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Pixinsight pros: -Stack, process, and post process all in one(?) -Very powerful and professional -Many tools, including star reduction(?) -Very Page 2 of 2 - A simple APP vs Pixinsight comparison for beginners - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Great discussion, I’ve recently been using all four of the major stackers available to me to compare: DSS, SIRIL 1. Now Id like to join the big leagues, so should I got for Startools or Pixinsight? Thanks. macOS Intel macOS Apple Silicon macOS. Siril makes it’s easy to throw out the bad frames, I usually throw out 20-25% based on size and roundness. Whilst DSS is perfectly serviceable and fit for purpose, not much has changed under the hood for years. fit format. I briefly used DSS to stack and Siril for everything else because DSS seemed easier. 8 It doesn't do multi session stacking properly, unlike DSS and it is mind numbingly slow (over an hour to process an image that DSS can handle in 5 minutes) but the results otherwise are OK. I've personally had worst results when stacking Siril compared to DSS, plus I just find DSS much easier to use. However, during your progress, sooner or later, you will hit the limits of DSS. Re: DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. This was around the time after D810A was announced. com ), In part because stacking large mosaics was one of its selling points. The image should already be stretched and processed. 30 posts Previous; 1; 2; 3; Carles Posts: 161 Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 5:06 pm. DSS I use for anything without a foreground (ie. Siril? I processed DSS/Siril stacks in Siril and ASI Studio I just processed in ASI studio (very rudimentary without nearly the capabilities Test: compared stacking DSS, SIRIL and PI - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: 130SLT, 294MC PRO, 385MC I made a small comparisation of those three most beloved programmes concerning stacking. Only problem is that my Altair 533 on my AT80EDT doesnt have the FOV to image it. DSS is much simpler to use 😂😂😂 The thing I like about Affinity is the nice balance it strikes between power and ease-of-use. My purpose was primarily to find the fastest stacker that did a good job because I shoot a lot of short subs. In my standard workflow I use Siril to do debayering, registration and stacking. Woohoo! So I decided to image M31 to participate in this months challenge. Any thoughts? Effect of superstacking 3 and 5 frames. Seelive. 15 VS 4. 2. Recent issue that got me scratching my head is this: ASIAir Dwarf II Tips: Get better stacking by converting Tif into Fits using Siril and after stacking in DeepSkyStacker to obtain a color stack with better quality. 30 x flats 30 x dark flats. Posted September 11, 2020. PI is the slowest. Post by Carles » This tutorial explains step-by-step how to process raw deep-sky images using, at first, the automatic processing capabilities of Siril scripts up to the stacking of the images, then the image improvement features of Siril to produce a final image for Web publication for example. (Release notes) Linux AppImage Linux Flatpak Linux Windows 64-bit Windows Portable Windows. That will work if you don't have any rotation. Whatever parameters I would try in PI, Siril gave superior stacks in terms of details vs noise. That's my only real gripe with DSS is that you can't make masters without stacking lights, but for freeware, I'm definitely not complaining. The Siril has DSS beat for stacking, so I'd recommend you check it out. Post by Carles » Comparing to stack the same set of subs in DSS, PI and Siril, I found Siril to deliver the best results. After using GraXpert on both, the DSS stack has a better balance. DSS tends to do a better job at eliminating satellite trails than ASTAP. What are the major changes in this version since last stable version, 1. 30 posts Previous; 1; 2; 3; Carles Posts: 190 Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 5:06 pm. I took around 125 subs of M3, stacked a master flat in ASIAIR (auto exposure), using my showing a white picture full screen, maximum brightness, stacked master bias, master dark (same Page 1 of 2 - Mosaics with SiriL? - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: After almost three months straight of cloudy skies, I had clear skies and almost-new moon last night. Still haven't found anything better than it for mosaics. I've stacked many images using Affinity, SiriL, PixInSight and APP, and really found very little difference between them. Just navigate to the home folder, and add four subfolders called 'lights', 'darks', 'biases' and 'flats', and run a script (blue button dropdown, and click). if i use the astro pixel, this software stack correctly, the problem, astro pixel is a test version and the final version is very expensive Please could somebody tell me if That's I'd call redundant work, to stack in DSS and then use Siril. But as I said, its up to you. 3 mouse clicks. A python script was available and covered here in a previous tutorial (now deleted), but it involved multiple additional dependencies, The thing I like about Affinity is the nice balance it strikes between power and ease-of-use. I used to use DSS, but got much better stacking results with Siril. Siril + Sirilic, Startools, Photoshop, Topaz (DeNoise, Gigapixel & Sharpen) Reply reply bizbizq • I switched from Dss to siril 2. 6 # DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. A this very moment I'm looking at the difference between the WBPP stack and DSS stack of the Cave Nebula subs I took last night. Post by Carles » Siril is much more hands on than DSS and doesn't automate the process, so I need to know exactly what to do. (Some I've played with in Python, and for mosaics, I'll fire up DSS. I understand that they should be taken with cap on at the same temp, gain and exposure as normal flats. By kinglevel September 10, 2020 in Imaging - Image Processing, Help and Techniques. Siril is free and much more capable, certainly worth learning and unlike PixInsight, it's free! DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. Both of these software options offer powerful features and tools, but which one is the rig Pixinsite vs Siril - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: I own a copy of Pixinsite. 30 posts Previous; 1; 2; 3; Carles Posts: 213 Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 5:06 pm. Siril, depending on settings, can be even faster. After stacking them all in Siril I'm getting a green image (camera is Omegon veTEC 16000 C Color), which sensor type is BGGR. I use mostly Siril for stacking, sometimes DSS for comparison. Stacking Rossette In DSS (Yellowish) vs. 9. 20 beta 2) che fra le altre cose integra la possibilità di usare Starnet++ come plugin per Page 1 of 2 - Awkward Stacking Result - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: As my battle with Siril continues, I see really weird things happened, cannot explain why. I find the sheer vastness of it's available processes gives so much fine control over every facet of the image and l really like that, but it is a slow procedure to complete an image - I can spend hours playing with settings and Before that I used siril. Post by Carles » bobharmony wrote: ↑ Sun Mar 28, 2021 6:15 pm Carles I have just begun working with Siril as an alternative to DSS this past week, and am also liking what I am seeing so far. The workfow is very differnt (DSS is for me simple too use), Siril stacks the same Picture in ~50% less time then DSS. They made it possible to chain processes. They are both fantastic. ASI Studio (Red) Vs. then Having been a user of DSS for several years, I've recently had a look at the stacking feature in ASTAP. A place to ask questions & help others with anything related to astrophotography DSS and Siril, when open the file in AutoDev, has an strong yellow cast before Wipe. This animation below is the same as shown above, but with superstacking by 3 the original data. Ill be processing in PixInsight afterwards. Background noise, Page 1 of 2 - Testing stacking quality of SIRIL vs PixInsight vs Astro Pixel Processor - posted in Experienced Deep Sky Imaging: Has anyone done rigorous testing of the stacking quality of the various options such as Pixinsigth vs Siril - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: I have seen many references saying that Pixinsigth is a fantastic software for Astrophotography and a need for some. Where the same stack takes around 30 minutes (or less?) in Siril. Start to finish Rosette Comparing to stack the same set of subs in DSS, PI and Siril, I found Siril to deliver the best results. I have DSS procedures for both OSC and Mono data sets over 1 night or multiple nights if your interested Clear Skies Martin. If you find Siril too bad (and I hate script and CLI based software) then Sirilic gets round some of the problems, although it spends ages copying files from one directory to DSS vs PixInsight for stacking - posted in Astronomy Software & Computers: I did stacking in DSS , however yesterday I downloaded PixInsight and I am wondering if I should redo stacking in the new software. . PixInsight When it comes to astrophotography, having the right software can make a world of difference. Siril, on the other hand really has become a kind of PI "Lite" in a remarkably short space of time. Top. The two images were both stacked using the same lights, darks, flats and dark flats. 5 November 22, 2024 Remove ads . The Siril team wish you all a very happy Christmas. Siril In Siril, one can open the DSS image and use the ‘Background Extraction’ tool. Home / Forum / Astrophotography Technical Forums / [Deep Sky] Processing techniques/ Siril vs Deep Sky Stacking [Deep Sky] Processing techniques · Dennis Spender · · 12 · 673 · 0 bobharmony wrote: ↑ Sun Mar 28, 2021 6:15 pm Carles I have just begun working with Siril as an alternative to DSS this past week, and am also liking what I am seeing so far. But what about filters, my flats are taken with different exposures depending on filter choice. It's still great software. I tested this all out over the last few nights and got some great stacks from both filters, plus a DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. Not much difference between stacking in DSS/APP but APP handles better background gradients. 30 posts Previous; 1; 2; 3; Carles Posts: 193 Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 5:06 pm. I run on striped SSD array and Siril + Sirilic just flies, even with my lengthy multisession integrations. Tell me: what are the processes or practices that make pi better than siril? Here is a video that goes over the difference between stacking software. Interestingly, during the alignment process it's flipped the image 180degree horizontally (compared to DSS) and I think colours have come out slightly better. OSCs and really only began using calibration frames last year. 1, the current stable version in February 2021 (download ). I spent hours watching YouTube tutorials on how to do stuff. 1000x1000 crops, resized Here is a further look at the topic comparing the results of stacking the same data with 6 programs. DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. alignment), it supports only basic transformations. SiriL because of Hello all. The sample points overlaying the Milky Way can be deleted by right clicking on them with, say, the Blue channel displayed. Hi Troy, thank you for your insights about Siril I'm happy with Siril for stacking, and usually don't run into problems. Using Siril, you can specify how many and which stars to use for registration. For my personal needs and taking inspiration from the first script, I wrote a first program in python that allowed to generate scripts with options (thresholds, and so on). The im Stacking Images Using DeepSkyStacker or SiriL - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Hi: Yes, I am quite a newbie with this. ASI Studio vs. I haven't found anything I'm bobharmony wrote: ↑ Sun Mar 28, 2021 6:15 pm Carles I have just begun working with Siril as an alternative to DSS this past week, and am also liking what I am seeing so far. 0 Starnet++ functionality was not integrated. That should be plenty. Post by Carles » DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. Ha = 17 x 360s, Temp -10 deg C, Gain 200, Offset 50. The grid of selected points will cover the Milky Way. The two layers are then merged using the ‘Difference’ blending mode. And new ones appeared. Post by Carles » Open the image in Siril that you want to reduce the stars in. 3. Step 1. I use deepskystacker to stack then move it to SiriL do a autostretch then a color calibration and background extraction which removes gradients/light pollution and move it to gimp stretch it do a S curve and tekn0lust • They are both fantastic. For now, I'm still stacking my FITS in DeepSkyStacker (DSS) because it feels easier and that's what I'm used to, but I'll certainly try Siril's stacking as soon as I collect new FITS (i. But WBPP is much better at alignin DSS Results vs Sequator Facebook; Twitter; Youtube; DSS Results vs Sequator. WO Z61, AstroTech field flattener, unmodified Canon 700D. For DSS and ASTAP I follow the recomended settings as per the Manual / website. After stacking images in DSS I get B&W photos (I add them to Siril for post-processing). x when it came out a while bobharmony wrote: ↑ Sun Mar 28, 2021 6:15 pm Carles I have just begun working with Siril as an alternative to DSS this past week, and am also liking what I am seeing so far. Background: I’m an experienced EAA’er but novice astrophotographer The few images I’ve processed have been made using DSS and PhotoShop I need/want PhotoShop, One to one comparison: Siril VS DSS - posted in Astronomy Software & Computers: I have just finished a comparison by using my own source files. ISO 1600, 280S, 49 frames. then Page 1 of 2 - SiriL, PI, APT, APP, and Startools, oh my! - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: There are too many choices and not enough obvious reasons to know which is best for me. DSS, but its not easy. Short 1 Minute Tutorials (DSS, Siril, Sequator) - posted in Astronomy Software & Computers: Hey everyone, I remember when I started out the exciting journey of astrophotography, the learning curve was quite steep and it can be quite challenging to begin. Once superstacking is completed, you can open superstack folder in Siril, and proceed with this new sequence exactly as described in the animation section. Pixinsight, for example, is very slow. I have had an extensive education for the past month wanting to get back into astronomy and the imaging process. I introduced the small tool to my astronomy club: @LaLoucheDuNord DSS works directly with pretty much any image format on the planet. For example, in the process of image registration (i. And only ASTAP shows Clear blue / tale. In the spirit of the season we are excited to present these twelve Christmas offerings which showcase the huge advances coming soon in Siril 1. In versions of Siril prior to 1. And right now I still don't get better result with pi to when processing the same data with siril. Yellow cast is totally normal as I use an OSC with L-pro filter and tends to give that cast untill I use whipe or in siril Background extraction. Also like mentioned is good in mosaics. DSS and ASTAP - fuzzier stars than others. For small stacks and mosaics APP works well, but it has terrible algorithm for Anyone using ASIAir and Siril - Question on file format (fit vs raw) - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Dear CloudyNighters, While I am slowly making progress with understanding my gear (largely because of the help from this awesome forum) there is still plenty of way to go on the learning curve. Any thoughts? bobharmony wrote: ↑ Sun Mar 28, 2021 6:15 pm Carles I have just begun working with Siril as an alternative to DSS this past week, and am also liking what I am seeing so far. Then I moved to Pixinsight, and got on with it a lot better than I expected. Everything about Pixinsight is deliberate Stacking in DSS and Processing in SIRIL - best file format to use? - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: I am just getting started in processing and I think I have figured out Deep Sky Stacker well enough that I am happy with the stacking results. 30 posts Previous; 1; 2; 3; Carles Posts: 191 Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 5:06 pm. 99. Has comet stacking feature but at the moment will not do both comet and star stack (like DSS - which occasionally doesn't succeed). There are settings in ASTAP in this regard, but from the limited playing I've New Siril Integration #. I use them for different purposes. I'm currently using Siril and Photoshop. 2 Beta, APP, and PI. Also, note that in my original post I suggested that that the problem was my mistake and/or ignorance. I am trying to use SIRIL to process my images after stacking in DSS and am trying to figure out the best file format to Astrophotography Software Showdown: Siril vs. FWIW, I used to have issues with calibration frames until I switched to Siril and stated doing the masters individually. I tried DSS V5. Click home icon, open the folder containing the folders above Step 2. I introduced the small tool to my astronomy club: @LaLoucheDuNord DSS and Siril, when open the file in AutoDev, has an strong yellow cast before Wipe. 14. My question concerns DeepSkyStacker and SiriL. SiriL: ~4 min. Page 1 of 2 - Stacking performance: PI vs. Any thoughts? DSS VS Astro pixel - posted in Astronomy Software & Computers: Good night I open this thread because i am trying to stack with DSS the pictures taken of M31 but it is impossible, nothing appear. Post by Carles » Page 2 of 3 - Best way to combine H Alpha, and Oxygen etc in Siril or DSS? - posted in DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging: I assume you meant OIII and Hα? You can follow the color palettes I mentioned in post 19, thats the standard way. e. What does FWHM mean? Why is it a good measure of the quality of your picture? Dynamic PSF tool # Dynamic PSF has been present for quite a while in Siril. dll every year. For comparison here's the same data stacked in DSS, 2 versions processed slightly differently in PS. I use siril, dss and sequator. SubaruB4 - Today, 05:18 PM Astronomy Software & Computers $300 DIY His tl;dr is: PI > SiriL and ASTAP > DSS > AP and APP > Sequator > RegiStar. Lots of big-city skyglow plus the local (Sodium streetlight ~30 Siril has been great for the initial stretch, background extraction, and color calibration, but it's extremely particular in a lot of ways that make the pre-processing a headache. Source Code. Questions and answers about processing in StarTools and how to accomplish certain tasks. (Yes, I know PI can also stack, though I dont specifically know how to do it yet, and I know DSS fairly well) Thanks! However, I think that if you look at the images I posted, SIRIL does a bad job of stacking my frames, while DSS and APP do vastly better. Home / Forum / Astrophotography Technical Forums / [Deep Sky] Processing techniques/ Siril vs Deep Sky Stacking [Deep Sky] Processing techniques · Dennis Spender · · 12 · 666 · 0 Hi, i compare the stacking time Siril vs. PI is at the 20:07 mark and Siril is at 34:00. Any thoughts? DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. If you think that the SIRIL result is good compared to DSS, then I really don’t know what to say. We don’t have a release date just yet as there are (very) few remaining loose ends to tie up, but we look forward to announcing a beta release early in 2025. DSS 5. The only down side to drizzling I have experienced (before I go Pixinsight) was that the the stand alone version of starnet2 never really worked on my drizzled images to remove stars without leaving giant rings and the photometric color calibration in SIRIL never seemed to be able to plate solve even with selecting the sampling for drizzling which made color correction Understanding “Dark Flats” - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Trying to get a better grip on calibration files and want to understand “Dark Flats” and how they work. - Siril is very fast. So Id upload your Hα file to the red, and Oiii to green and DSS and Siril, when open the file in AutoDev, has an strong yellow cast before Wipe. 5% base and Siril runs faster on my computer and required less free disk space during stacking, so that was my main decision point between the two. 30 posts Previous; 1; 2; 3; Carles Posts: 150 Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 5:06 pm. And it's reasonably fast. PixInsight is where everyone eventually ends up. Stretching was done in APP for all three stacks with 15% BG, 3 sigma, 2. 30 posts Previous; 1; 2; 3; Carles Posts: 197 Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 5:06 pm. APP was not very fast (compared to Siril) but improved in latest beta. DSS and Siril, when open the file in AutoDev, has an strong yellow cast before Wipe. Myself, as DSS vs Siril vs ASTAP. Siril - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Can anyone explain why stacking in Pixinsight takes so long relative to other products? When comparing PI WBPP to Siril, about 400 frames, PI takes about 4 hours on my system. - Siril can use master correction files created by APP. But of course, as Siril is a free software, you can build from the sources, available through the installation page. Siril does stacking even faster than DSS. DSS & Startrails - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Im struggling getting DSS to do star trails. All three tools used similar stacking parameters. - Similar results. I hope to be able compare both programms again Introduction # Genesis # In June 2018, with version 0. 3. However, some people told me that 3. PixInsight is where everyone eventually ends up I wouldn't say DSS better at all. Any thoughts? DSS and Siril, when open the file in AutoDev, has an strong yellow cast before Wipe. Is there anything useful in Siril that s-dss-vs-astap/ Also, another useful feature that siril has, over PI, are developers that are very proactive and helpful in addressing bug reports - Cyril, Cecil, and Adrian are doing an amazing job Sequator vs DSS for Stacking - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Hello fellow space junkies, I havent been able to find an equivalent in DSS to Sequators Accumulation stacking method. galaxies, nebula, constellations, ) As I get better with Photoshop I'll probably stack more exclusively in DSS and use Photoshop to bring in the foreground. Post by Carles » Trouble with stacking- PI, SIRIL, DSS - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Recently I have had some serious trouble with stacking and I cant understand why A year ago, when I started with this hobby, I had no issues with stacking, no matter how horrible the frames were, now I have decent material, but stacking software do not cooperate with me anymore, Remove ads . It includes two free programs, Siril and Images Plus, a third, either ‘rented or purchased’ program, Astro Pixel Processor and the updated Look at these two images of M13, one stacked with DSS and one stacked with Siril (second one): See how the orange HD star has a halo around it from imprecise stacking on DSS, which doesn’t appear with Siril. Edited by maxsid, 24 January 2024 - 03:02 AM. APP is the second slowest but reasonably fast. Aligning but NOT Stacking 3 Seperate Images in DSS or SIRILhow can this be so hard?!? - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Hi All, Ive been using a single L-eXtreme filter for HA+OIII, but recently got a Askar D2 Filter to capture OIII and SII with my one OSC camera. Members; 326 482 Posted Page 1 of 4 - Startools or Pixinsight - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Ive been using free software - DSS, Siril, Gimp. 0rc1 is distributed for the 3 most common platforms (Windows, macOS, GNU / Linux). M42 dslr processed with StarTools vs Siril - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Tis the season for beginners to post their M42 pics In this case, 219x60-sec images. I would still argue proper calibration frames will improve an image- did you try siril stacking with calibration files? It's 10 times slower than Siril and it produces similar or worse quality stacks. Don’t forget that we also need . It can very be useful in many occasions, like global star registration. He agreed with dm60062003 that ASTAP gave a better looking stack, at least for his test photos, but he downgraded ASTAP a little vs. That is to say strecth and export a video. I would say that DSS is a bit easier to use, especially for total beginners. It might also effect what you get with PI compared with DSS if there is a difference. Siril (Greyish) - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: Anyone have any thoughts on why Im getting such different results when stacking in DSS vs. Thanks in advance for any help! 1 Replies 32; Created 4 yr; Last Reply 4 yr; Top Posters In This Topic. I'm about ready to go back to DSS for stacking for everything. Comparison between the single image (top) (Sony RX10 ISO 6400) and the result of stacking 30 images better known as DSS, SiriL is a freeware, cross-platform, astrophotography package that will let you calibrate, In this tutorial, we will analyze an image thanks to its stars. It seems that the stack produced by Siril shows a bit more detail than the DSS result. Here is a comparison of the same DSS-stacked TIFF, developed in Affinity Photo (using curve adjustments) and in Siril + Affinity Photo : I think any successes you have would just be down to the stacking settings, the likes of sigma clipping, kappa, etc. In fact, DSS is still king - its interface is the easiest and fastest to use, its speed of stacking is good, and it makes almost as good stacks as Siril. ) Then I tend to use Gimp for adjusting some of it, or some of the other fits tools and things like ImageJ. Stacking included building masters for flats, darks and bias. Dynamic PSF window when star detection Siril is so incomprehensible and counterintuitive to me that I stopped trying. Further processing I do in PI. I want to be able to take many images from my dslr, but instead of Siril has DSS beat for stacking, so I'd recommend you check it out. But between the three, APP gives me the best results. 4 nights over a week with no moon from my inner-suburb driveway. lxgfnd mkaljhm aivo vamne xwra pzk eqho ymgtvej qkoad lnwckoh